A governmental blunder that probably won't hurt us. Much.

["Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>]

For reasons that are unimportant here, I was looking at an OSHA  
publication, https://www.osha.gov/Publications/3120.html

In that document I noticed FIVE uses of a strange word "inpidual" where  
"individual" would have been expected. "New piece of governmentese," I  
thought. Further research showed that other government documents have  
similar problems. For example, where "division" might be expected,  
"pision" appears. The problem seems to go back as far as 2014 at least.  
E.g.: https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/dbaallemployer9-30-13.htm

I doubt there is any way to make money correcting this blunder, which must  
have been caused by a well-meaning person's wholesale replacement of <div>  
with <p>, or rather div with p, in many documents. If there were, it would  
already have happened. Maybe I should send it on to Scott Adams, who might  
find some use for it.

Stop the presses! It just gets worse! Two more inpiduals here, from 2011:  
https://www.pacificjustice.org/press/rulings-on-health-care-mandate-set-up-supreme-court-showdown/

Who writes this stuff?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | https://techwhirl.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications?  Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions?  Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives