TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: gender vs. sex From:Shannon Ford <shannon -at- UNIFACE -dot- NL> Date:Thu, 7 Oct 1993 12:34:57 +0100
> From MAILER-DAEMON -at- sun4nl Thu Oct 7 11:40:10 1993
> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1993 11:10:37 +0100
> From: MAILER-DAEMON -at- NL -dot- net (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
> Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
> To: shannon -at- uniface -dot- uniface -dot- nl
> Content-Length: 2332
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ERROR: SUVM1 not in EARN/BITNET routing tables
> 554 SUVM1.bitnet!TECHWR-L... Service unavailable
(Sorry, this bounced)
> Steve Fouts writes:
> > Did I get left out of a major usage change in the last couple of years?
> > Just exactly when did the terms GENDER and SEX become synonymous? I get
> > questionaires now that ask me what my gender is. I have to think, "well,
> > most times I am referred to as he or him, which is masculine, sometimes
> > as a part of a they or them, which is neuter, and rarely as it, also
> > neuter. Very rarely as a feminine now that I stopped wearing my hair (as)
> > long." Hmmm, I'd say masculine, mostly. Sometimes a little neuter.
> > My SEX is male. I have two X chromosones. My sex and my gender don't
> > even have to match. Today, I'm feeling rather butch.
> > Is this some kind of Victorian backlash thing? Are we going to start
> > referring to legs as limbs again? Is SEX a dirty word now so we have to
> > resort to the more ambiguous gender? Am I the only one bothered by this?
Sex isn't a dirty word, but often is used to mean the ACT instead of whether
you are male or female, so perhaps we are being *less* ambiguous using gender.
Anyway, my dictionary lists the definition `sex:male or female' before the
grammatical meaning (Webster's 1959 2nd edition). Since we aren't discussing
grammar, readers (probably) do not misinterpret what we mean by gender.
In addition, I think that what is being discussed has much more to do with
masculine and feminine role definitions than what it means to have 2 X
chromosomes, which is further argument for using the word gender.