TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Most Important Programs to Learn From:Steven Owens <uso01 -at- MAILHOST -dot- UNIDATA -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 18 Nov 1993 11:44:34 -0600
Gary Dettmers says:
> You are right Stefan, I don't know you. How many people in the list do know
> you? The initial message you posted indicated to anyone who read it that it's
> OK to just find second hand software and upgrade. I did not (could not) read
> between the lines that you are practicing a legal method for procuring
> legitimate software.
Yet you did (could) read between the lines that he was practicing
an ILLEGAL method for procuring (illegitimate?) software? I don't see the
validity of that statement.
I feel a need to comment here, due to experiences I've had in the
past with hasty and unfounded accusations.
> Your original message did not provide information that clearly stated
> your ownership status of the FM software.
So you assumed it was illegally acquired, showing a startling
lack of respect for his professionalism and possible repercussions to
his reputation. Was this wise?
>I don't doubt your word Stefan, and I would not have doubted it if you
> made it know to me (and others) the first time.
You have to be careful of your words in this medium; they may
reach farther and have a stronger effect than you anticipate, and you
may not exercise the same care you would for a published medium; for
example, if Stefan had said that in a letter-to-the-editor in a magazine,
would your response have been quite so immediate and vehement?
A good rule of thumb to follow in eletronically mediated
communication is to step back and think a bit before reacting. You
have to handle issues with a deliberate gentility that you wouldn't
bother using in real life, where you have less immediate communication
channels and/or more subsidiary channels (body language, tone, facial