Re: Future Demand for Tech Writers

Subject: Re: Future Demand for Tech Writers
From: Sarah Mahoney <smahoney -at- U -dot- WASHINGTON -dot- EDU>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 1994 11:45:00 -0800


> Inquiring minds want to know: Was that reference to "chopping at the bit"
> a simple typo, or has the phrase "champing at the bit" [or, perhaps,
> "chomping at the bit"] simply become so removed from its origins that only
> nitpickers like me notice when it's mangled? Is it now in the same category
> as "intensive purposes"? :-)

It probably has gone the way of "beating a dead horse," which my boss
uses all the time, and makes me (an animal lover) cringe every time!
-Sarah Mahoney
-U.W., Seattle - go huskies!


Previous by Author: Re: Embedded Indexing Software (RFC of 12/93)
Next by Author: Re: Desperately Seeking Icons
Previous by Thread: Re: Future Demand for Tech Writers
Next by Thread: Re: Future Demand for Tech Writers


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads