TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:indexes From:Bonni Graham <bonnig -at- AOL -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 1 Apr 1994 12:26:51 EST
Mike Pope asks:
"Ok, soapbox stepped off from, would you need the index if everything were
strictly alphabetical? Or maybe need it less, should I ask? The only time I
imagine an index to be very handy in an alpha reference is if there are lots
of keyword values <snip>"
The first WordPerfect book I had was a strictly alphabetical listing of
WordPerfect's features -- by the name of the feature. Well and good, but
what if I don't call that feature by that name? Things like the table for
ASCII characters and the codes you needed to type to access them were present
under their Wordperfect name -- Special Characters. If there had been no
index with both the WP term and alternates, I never would have found what I
was looking for. Or in the Ventura 3.0 book -- I looked up thumb tabs under
eveything I could think of. Finally found them by accident looking up
information on repeating frames - because, although the text mentioned that
you could use repeating frames for thumb tabs it had not been indexed. Even
if the manual had been strictly alphabetical, the information I needed would
have been listed under its function name, not under possible uses.
So I maintain that you need to make index decisions based more on the size of
the book, rather than the organization.
Just my $0.02!
BonniG -at- aol -dot- com