Re: Standards

Subject: Re: Standards
From: doug montalbano <doug_montalbano -at- CC -dot- CHIRON -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 1994 15:00:18 PST

On 14 July (happy Bastille Day, documenteurs et documenteuses) Caryn
Rizell wrote about standards, noting that, while different standards
exist, we should agree upon some.

Well, asking us to agree on anything (and STAY in agreement) doesn't
sound too realistic. Besides which, there are good reasons for the
standards to be different.

What I would like to see (and I'm hoping others will agree (but see
above)) is a table (and it would be large, so maybe a series of
tables) listing variant standards (oxymorons are our way of life), a
citation to authority, definition and the general type of *audience*
for which that is a standard. That is,

kb TI Manual xxx kilobit Programmers
kB TI Manual xxx kilobyte Programmers
K SI 1000 metric
K JEDEC Std 100 1024 computer industry

We'd have to have separate tables for abbreviations, for spelling, for
punctuation, and so on.

Would this be more helpful? At least you may then know when you're
following your audience's expectations, and be tipped off as to when
to shift.

Doug Montalbano <> Technical Writer <> Chiron Corporation
Doug_Montalbano -at- cc -dot- chiron -dot- com <> (510) 601-2862 (voice/TDD)
If anybody wanted to tell me something, they'd have to write it
on a piece of paper and shove it over to me. They'd get bored
as hell doing that after a while, and then I'd be through with
having conversations for the rest of my life.
_The Catcher in the Rye_

Previous by Author: Re: BB Manners 101
Next by Author: Re: METRICS
Previous by Thread: Re: standards
Next by Thread: Re: Standards

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads