Re: What the f -at- #$?

Subject: Re: What the f -at- #$?
From: "Scott J. Wilson" <scott -at- WWTC -dot- TIMEPLEX -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 1994 07:32:39 -0700

Kate Schommer wrote:

>Of course, in some situations, you have to be creative in order to sneak
>"naughty" words past the automated censor program. But why not be truly
>creative, then, and come up with something better? E-mail allows us to
>think before we "speak", so howsabout taking advantage? I would enjoy a
>break from worn-out phrases that lost their shock value before I was out
>of grade school. How about "accursed for eternity" instead of "damned"?

Excellent comments, Kate.

I find it especially ironic that on the techwr-l list we can't find better
ways to amuse, offend, exasperate than by using relatively common "curse words."

Scott J. Wilson
scott -at- wwtc -dot- timeplex -dot- com

Previous by Author: Re: Is this why paper books ...
Next by Author: Re: "Lower right-hand corner" Yuck!
Previous by Thread: Re: What the f -at- #$?
Next by Thread: Re: What the f -at- #$?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads