TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: A bit more about wp programs. From:Aahz <aahz -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 9 Sep 1994 04:18:15 GMT
In article <9409071303 -dot- AA15467 -at- brs -dot- com>, John Russell <johnr -at- brs -dot- com> wrote:
>> >> Because
>> tables are the only to format parallel columns in Word (WP has both
>> tables and parallel columns), Word is nearly useless for my style of
>I situation might be an outdented heading. We used to use them regularly,
>until we went to 7x9 page layout (from 8.5x11). The heading would look
>This is My Here is the text of the section. I would include
>Sample Outdented all relevant information bla bla bla. But it
>Heading parallels the outdented heading, so a hanging
> indent wouldn't work. And, a table might even
> be awkward. We worked around this by creating a
> macro that inserted a pre-formatted frame and then
> inserted the text of the heading into it. But I
> don't think this is what the original poster meant.
This is exactly what I was talking about. WordPerfect has "parallel
columns", which does this with no difficulty. WordPerfect tables also
work, because you can use styles to ensure that all tables have the same
formatting. I *do not* like Word's table feature.
--- Aahz (@netcom.com)
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Androgynous kinky vanilla queer het
The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a question,
but to post the wrong information.