Re: Why manuals?

Subject: Re: Why manuals?
From: Kat Nagel <KatNagel -at- AOL -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 21:39:19 EDT

ggall -at- ca -dot- oracle -dot- com writes:

>This shouldn't be construed as an anti-online doc. stance. It's not. They
just both >have their place until we get our "Sony Bookman"s and take them to
the park to >read.

(Soapbox filter ON)

...and until Sony makes a Bookperson <grin> that lets me

(Soapbox filter OFF)

katnagel -at- aol -dot- com

Previous by Author: Re: Survey:Initial Contac
Next by Author: Re: To Vet or Not to Vet
Previous by Thread: Re: Why manuals?
Next by Thread: Re: Why manuals?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads