Re: To Vet or Not to Vet

Subject: Re: To Vet or Not to Vet
From: Kat Nagel <KatNagel -at- AOL -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 21:39:23 EDT

re_allen -at- pnl -dot- gov writes:
>a quite, covert check into the background of someone we wish to
>recruit as an agent or informant. The person belongs to the group
>we wish to penetrate, therefore we cannot openly ask about the

The analogy to veterinarians holds up well. You can't expect direct answers
from felines, canines or equines either. And their owners aren't always
observant or cooperative enough to be helpful.

katnagel -at- aol -dot- com

Previous by Author: Re: Why manuals?
Next by Author: Re: HELP!! Business case
Previous by Thread: Re: To Vet or Not to Vet
Next by Thread: Re: mail delivery error-retry

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads