Re: To Vet or Not to Vet

Subject: Re: To Vet or Not to Vet
From: Kat Nagel <KatNagel -at- AOL -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 21:39:23 EDT

re_allen -at- pnl -dot- gov writes:
>a quite, covert check into the background of someone we wish to
>recruit as an agent or informant. The person belongs to the group
>we wish to penetrate, therefore we cannot openly ask about the
>person.

The analogy to veterinarians holds up well. You can't expect direct answers
from felines, canines or equines either. And their owners aren't always
observant or cooperative enough to be helpful.

@kat
katnagel -at- aol -dot- com


Previous by Author: Re: Why manuals?
Next by Author: Re: HELP!! Business case
Previous by Thread: Re: To Vet or Not to Vet
Next by Thread: Re: mail delivery error-retry


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads