TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Guide vs. Manual (summary) From:Mark Levinson <mark -at- SD -dot- CO -dot- IL> Date:Thu, 6 Oct 1994 11:16:25 IST
Thanks to all who responded to my request for lightning responses on
"User's Guide" vs. "User's Manual."
"Guide" had the majority by 6 to 1, and there was 1 "doesn't matter"
and 1 "they mean different things, so use the appropriate one." Most
who responded felt "Guide" was more helpful-sounding, less unnerving.
David Bergart wrote:
I'd say that a guide tells people how to do something, whereas the scope of
a manual can extend to specifying how they MUST do that something, and to
providing extensive data---overlapping the province of a handbook.
Sherri Hall's unnamed peer favored "manual" because "it's the word
Apologies in advance to anyone whose wisdom is not represented here
because it didn't arrive on time. As a matter of fact, my company's
decision on which term to use has been postponed because one of the
folks involved is on sick leave, so late responses will actually
not be wasted...
||- Mark L. Levinson, mark -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il -- Box 5780, 46157 Herzlia, Israel -||
|| You can't judge right by looking at the wrong. - Willie Dixon ||