TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Background From:Karen Kay <karenk -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 3 Nov 1994 12:37:53 -0800
Elaine Winters said:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 1994, Rose Wilcox wrote:
> > A person with a strong ability
> > to learn foreign languages is obviously quite intelligent.
> Not necessarily; they may just be left-brained - -
> they're probably somewhat good at math - - and
> maybe not so graphically or spacially oriented.
I think I've got the attributions straight here. Whoever said that a
person with a strong ability to learn foreign languages is obviously
quite intelligent is dead wrong. If it were true, Europeans would by
definition be smarter than Americans. And a further corollary would be
that people who can't learn foreign languages are unintelligent.
Neither of these are true. The ability to learn foreign languages is
affected more by exposure before puberty than by native intelligence.
As for learning foreign languages, well, some people just can't. Their
brains don't work right for that. But that doesn't mean they are
Frankly, as a linguist and language teacher turned technical writer,
such sentiments horrify me. I had to have proficiency in five
languages for my Ph.D. program, but I think if I'd been intelligent, I
would have just chosen a different Ph.D. program.....