TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Background From:Karen Kay <karenk -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 3 Nov 1994 15:34:52 -0800
Rose Wilcox said:
> There *are* studies that suggest that folks who speak two languages
> in the home as children tend to be more intelligent than those who
> speak only one.
But there is a very *big* difference between learning a foreign
language as a child and as an adult. Learning a second language as an
adult has not been shown to have a direct effect on verbal ability or
intelligence as far as I know. (I'm not a psycholinguist, and don't
even play one on TV.)
> Some people who are skilled at technical subjects are *not*
> skilled verbally.
I didn't read your original comment, because I find your posts
impenetrable. I'm sorry, but in your posts I can't tell which is
quoted material and which is original material.
I seemed to have distorted what you said by reading only Elaine's
short extract, which is my fault.
> Maybe my original case could be stated better, however:
> Verbal intelligence without a smattering of technical intelligence
> will result in a writer who works better in an environment where
> they format, proof, and edit technical peoples' work rather
> than do direct technical writing. The best set of types of
> intelligence for a tech writer will include verbal ability
> and technical ability.