TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Line spacing in bullet lists From:mpriestley -at- VNET -dot- IBM -dot- COM Date:Mon, 5 Dec 1994 11:30:04 EST
Keith Soltys writes:
>I'd like some feedback on formatting lists. When using bulleted lists,
>is there any standard for applying spacing between items? When I was
The rationale for the IBM standard (compact for single-line lists, uncompact
for lists that contain multiple-line items) is:
- the bullets indicate a new list item, but the user has to be scanning the
left column to notice it. It's nice to provide a way to indicate a new
list item, that goes across the whole page, so if they're scanning down
the middle of the page, they still notice the break without having to
depend on peripheral vision.
- If every list item fits on a single line, then a new line itself signifies
a new list item. This is easy to scan for.
- If some items are multiple lines, then the new line itself does not
necessarily indicate a new list item. So instead, you put an empty line
between each list item, to break them up and set them apart. Otherwise
the list items can "blur" together, and it's harder to tell when you
move from item to item. Try removing the lines from the list in this note,
and you'll see what I mean.
So: I'd stick with the IBM standard. Compact lists (no lines between items)
when each list item fits on a single line. Uncompact lists (one line
between items) when at least one item needs multiple lines.
That way, there's always a clear break between list items.
Note: this is _my_ justification for the standard, off the top of my head.
Hope this helps,
mpriestley -at- vnet -dot- ibm -dot- com
Disclaimer: speaking on my own behalf, not IBM's.