Re: Line spacing in bullet lists

Subject: Re: Line spacing in bullet lists
From: mpriestley -at- VNET -dot- IBM -dot- COM
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 1994 11:30:04 EST

Keith Soltys writes:
>I'd like some feedback on formatting lists. When using bulleted lists,
>is there any standard for applying spacing between items? When I was

The rationale for the IBM standard (compact for single-line lists, uncompact
for lists that contain multiple-line items) is:

- the bullets indicate a new list item, but the user has to be scanning the
left column to notice it. It's nice to provide a way to indicate a new
list item, that goes across the whole page, so if they're scanning down
the middle of the page, they still notice the break without having to
depend on peripheral vision.

- If every list item fits on a single line, then a new line itself signifies
a new list item. This is easy to scan for.

- If some items are multiple lines, then the new line itself does not
necessarily indicate a new list item. So instead, you put an empty line
between each list item, to break them up and set them apart. Otherwise
the list items can "blur" together, and it's harder to tell when you
move from item to item. Try removing the lines from the list in this note,
and you'll see what I mean.

So: I'd stick with the IBM standard. Compact lists (no lines between items)
when each list item fits on a single line. Uncompact lists (one line
between items) when at least one item needs multiple lines.

That way, there's always a clear break between list items.

Note: this is _my_ justification for the standard, off the top of my head.

Hope this helps,

Michael Priestley
mpriestley -at- vnet -dot- ibm -dot- com
Disclaimer: speaking on my own behalf, not IBM's.

Previous by Author: Re: He/she
Next by Author: Re: Computer Dictionary
Previous by Thread: Re: Line spacing in bullet lists
Next by Thread: Re[2]: Line spacing in bullet lists

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads