Re: Liability Insurance for Cont

Subject: Re: Liability Insurance for Cont
From: Romay Jean Sitze <rositze -at- NMSU -dot- EDU>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 1994 10:39:59 -0700

On Tue, 6 Dec 1994, Gwen Gall wrote:

> When I was visiting the Oracle Headquarters in California, a contract writer
> told me he had been asked to sign an agreement with a potential
> contracting employer (NOT Oracle) stating his own liability for any errors or
> omissions in the documentation. This meant that, should a customer ever sue
> software company for something resulting from erroneous documentation, the
> technical writer, and not the company, would be liable.

> He, and I, were rightly appalled. Given all the dependencies a documentor has
> in information sources, etc., I think it is unreasonable to pin this on the
> writer. Also, it seems to me just another way for a big company to sucker the
> little guy.

What a frightening thought! I hope this is not common.


RoMay Sitze rositze -at- nmsu -dot- edu

Practice makes perfect--or perfectly awful.
It depends on what you practice.


Previous by Author: Re: Line spacing in bullet li
Next by Author: Re: redundancy
Previous by Thread: Re: Liability Insurance for Cont
Next by Thread: Re: Liability Insurance for Cont

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads