Re: redundancy

Subject: Re: redundancy
From: Romay Jean Sitze <rositze -at- NMSU -dot- EDU>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 1994 00:50:35 -0700

I would vote to retain the redundancy, but hope you can find a better way
of phrasing the sentence. In this case, I believe the redundancy both
helps to clarify the nature of the warning and reinforces its importance.

> "Always operate at speeds that allow you to have complete control of the
> tractor / and can maneuver safely or stop in case of an emergency."

> Probably not the best sentence to begin with, but his feeling was that
> "complete control" would imply "maneuver safely. . . ."

> Pete

> -----------------------------------
> Pete Praetorius ,--O
> ppraeto -at- hubcap -dot- clemson -dot- edu _ \<,_
> ppraeto -at- clemson -dot- clemson -dot- edu (_)/ (_)


RoMay Sitze rositze -at- nmsu -dot- edu

Practice makes perfect--or perfectly awful.
It depends on what you practice.


Previous by Author: Re: Liability Insurance for Cont
Next by Author: Re: PAPER PRICES RISIN
Previous by Thread: Re: redundancy
Next by Thread: Re[2]: redundancy

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads