Re: Year 2000

Subject: Re: Year 2000
From: Mike Mcgraw <mcgraw -at- BROOKTREE -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 1994 14:44:29 -0800

> I just had to edit a technical paper and saw a date expressed
> as 08/17/00; implying the year 2000.

> Question is, is this going to be the commonly used form of
> expressing the year?

Well, that would be 08/17/2K, Mark. :*)

Previous by Author: Re: Mosaic as an online ...
Next by Author: Re: STC Web Home Page
Previous by Thread: Year 2000
Next by Thread: Re: Year 2000

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads