TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: click on, select, choose From:Ned Bedinger <qwa -at- ESKIMO -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 19 Dec 1994 15:45:12 GMT
In article <MiwuR5a00iV_M5_YFO -at- andrew -dot- cmu -dot- edu>, Jill R Shapiro
<jsbz+ -at- andrew -dot- cmu -dot- edu> says:
>"click on" for icons. This seems pretty convoluted to me, but it also
I think your instinct is good. Writers have the option
of including graphics when needed, but they should not
have the option of creating random terminology to alleviate
boredom. While I do recognize the usage and longevity of
the various terms and specialized meanings (select, choose, etc),
I cannot find any reason to prefer them over 'click'. When I
write my own docs for my own software, I use only click. When
I write for someone else, I have to use their conventions, which
usually include a bunch of pussy-footing around with abstrations
about the mousepointer-software interface. I find that 'click'
is the least ambiguous, most direct way to describe what a user
does to choose, select, actuate, whatever....