Re: Grammar vs Content

Subject: Re: Grammar vs Content
From: "Robert E. Allen" <re_allen -at- PNL -dot- GOV>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 1995 15:52:40 GMT

In article <9500277912 -dot- AA791220336 -at- MAIL -dot- SYNTRON -dot- COM>, PUTMV -at- mail -dot- syntron -dot- com

> ... its seems that many of my new
> peers have different writing priorities. They place grammar ahead of
> content. When asked to review anything for content, its the grammar,
> spelling, and format they comment on instead of providing help on the
> subject.

I fall into this trap sometimes. Excuses:

1. I find poor grammer offensive, I can't help myself, I have to mark
it up. I don't want anyone to think I missed those mistakes.

2. Deadlines being what they are, after I fix the grammer, there may
not be time to really look at the content and flow of the document.

3. Let's face it, it's easier to do the grammer than figure out the logic
behind the author's writing.

PS I hope my manager is too busy to read the list today.

Previous by Author: Re: why we'll never be paperless
Next by Author: Re: Paperless
Previous by Thread: Re: technical Writing Skills
Next by Thread: Re: Grammar vs Content

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads