Re[2]: equipment standard?

Subject: Re[2]: equipment standard?
From: Brian Boisvert <brianb -at- ICONICS -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 1995 19:04:45 EST

>>> So when you push for that upgrade, why not push for a Mac? I think
>>> you'll be glad you did.
>>
>>Unless you need to use screen shots of a Windows or OS/2 product
>>in your docs. Then, having to port the graphics over to the MAC
>>is a real liability. I never found a good way to do it (and I'm
>>glad I don't have that problem here!).
>
>How about a Power Mac 6100/66 with DOS compatibility. We're
>currently testing one here. Wow!
>
>-Val

How are those machines anyway, as far as performance and price goes?
I haven't read much about them, but I would think that they would
really catch on if they were both powerful and reasonably priced . . .

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian R. Boisvert Technical Writer
brianb -at- iconics -dot- com Iconics, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------


Previous by Author: Re[2]: Famous tech. communicators in literature?
Next by Author: Need help with Word 6.0
Previous by Thread: Re: equipment standard?
Next by Thread: Re: equipment standard?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads