Re: Re[2]: Mac Doom

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Mac Doom
From: David Eric Dahl <ddahl -at- HARP -dot- AIX -dot- CALPOLY -dot- EDU>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 16:52:25 -0700

Exactly! PCs have finally caught up. FUNCTIONALITY isn't the issue
anymore. It's:
1) What the software runs on
2) What the user is comfortable with
3) Who you need to be compatible with

Mac+PC Dave

On Fri, 14 Apr 1995, Arlen P. Walker wrote:

> However, my DX4-100 not only has complete multimedia,
> 3-D CAD modeling and publishing capabilities, it also
> speaks and understands my voice commands.

> <This Rant(TM) is directed at Apple Marketing>
> One more good example of the Failure of Apple Marketing. Mac's were doing
speech
> synthesis ten years ago (anyone remember the Talking Moose?) and were also the
> first of the desktop machines to do speech recognition (not ten, but still
years
> ago, with Voice Navigator and similar products). Yet most folks still link
> Compaq in particular and PC's in general with both these functions, and
consider
> them relatively new developments in desktop machines.

> <end Rant(TM)>


> Have fun,
> Arlen
> Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
> DNRC 124

> Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
> ----------------------------------------------
> In God we trust; all others must provide data.
> ----------------------------------------------


Previous by Author: Re: Mac Doom
Next by Author: Re: How do I print Acrobat file?
Previous by Thread: Re[2]: Mac Doom
Next by Thread: Re: Producing Newsletters


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads