Re: Big time APOLOGY

Subject: Re: Big time APOLOGY
From: Patrick O'Connell <patrick -at- EICON -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 10:36:58 -0400

I think that Scot's intentions were fundamentally good, but there were two
problems with what he posted:

1) There appeared to be one or two cover letters to a couple of the
employers on the list included in what Scot posted;

2) The stuff that wasn't personal -- what could have been of interest to
the rest of us -- was poorly formatted.

Yet another example of why you should follow Rule of Posting #1,7286: always
check what you're about to post BEFORE you post it.



Pat
.-------------------------------------------------------------------.
|\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\
||\-----------------------------.-------------------------------------.
|\| Patrick Brian O'Connell ! Intermediate Writer,Eicon Technology|
.|| These are my opinions, not ! Corporation / (B) 514-631-9825 x3250|
\| Eicon Technology's. ! Net (B):patrick -at- eicon -dot- com |
'-----------------------------'-------------------------------------'


Previous by Author: Re: BOOKS: Updated Listing -- three cheers for Greg!
Next by Author: I will no longer be reachable at any work address
Previous by Thread: Big time APOLOGY
Next by Thread: Re. Conditional plurals


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads