TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Agencies & Self-empl tax From:Ron Miller <RSMH -at- AOL -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 2 May 1995 16:20:25 -0400
Dave Demyan writes:
WARNING: 1099 REPORTING IS DANGEROUS AND SHOULD BE AVOIDED FOR CONTRACT
I don't know about that, Dave. I have been a freelancer for over seven years
and have worked as a 1099 contractor for all that time. If there is a problem
with this, it is on my client's end, not mine as the contractor. I have
worked for a lot of firms that deal this way. Although I often get work
without an agency's assistance, when I do, I bill the agency and receive a
check. I still get a 1099 at the end of the year, and this is through
perfectly reputable agencies. I don't want to get into a debate over tax laws
here, but I know a lot of freelancers, and most of us work in this fashion.
I have a CPA and she has never indicated that this is a problem at all. I pay
quartlerly taxes as a self-employed sole proprietor. This is certainly not a
way around paying taxes. In fact, I pay more because I have to pay Social
Security as both employer and employee (a whopping 15% or thereabouts). So
there are no loopholes here.
By the way, I do all my work at home, so this may be the difference. I don't
think you should be panicking people unless you are really certain of the