TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Regarding tests From:Scot <scot -at- HCI -dot- COM -dot- AU> Date:Fri, 5 May 1995 13:58:32 +1000
>Five people specifically mentioned that entry-level candidates should take a
>brief writing test. This opinion was shared by both interviewers and
>interviewees. (The other four responses didn't mention tests at all, either for
>or against.) Some people suggested types of tests to give:
We use a writing test for all potential contractors (as well as traditional
interview methods). Becuase we're a consultancy, and come up against a wide
variety of documentation tasks, the test has to be as generic as possible.
We ask the writers to describe how to make a telephone call to someone who
has never seen a telephone.
Its a good test of whether they can tailor their writing for a particular
audience - its very easy to assume knowledge. You'd be surprised how many
people start by explaining about telephone exchanges and other technical
data, or how much stream-of-consciousness we get.
HCI Consulting Better Communications Better Management.
(61-2)247-3437 (ph) http://www.hci.com.au/management/
(61-2)247-5160 (fax) GPO Box 4846 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia
The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of HCI
Consulting, its management, its employees, or even myself.