TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Responding to Slaton spam: From:"Eric J. Ray" <ejray -at- GALAXY -dot- GALSTAR -dot- COM> Date:Sat, 19 Aug 1995 06:13:23 -0500
Well, the count me in messages shouldn't be going to the list. The rest
of it shouldn't either, but if someone is willing to take the time
to work with a New Mexico lawyer and get this going, I'm all for it ($5
and all).
More to the point, these discussions should probably leave the list now.
I'd imagine that Okstate lawyers would take a dim view of this one. No
flames, please--remember, I've worked with them. Thanks.
Finally, as someone else suggested, make SURE you know where your money is
going before you send a check. Spoofing an E-mail message isn't difficult.
Eric
TECHWR-L Listowner
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* Please note new E-Mail address! *
Eric J. Ray
ejray -at- galaxy -dot- galstar -dot- com
On Fri, 18 Aug 1995, Scott, Vester wrote:
> There was something in yesterday's paper about the Feds clamping down on the
> telephone version of this kind of crap. Wonder if it applies here . . .
> And, importantly, are we allowed to talk about this here? I can't remember.
> -Vester
> ----------
> From: John.Renish
> To: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L
> Subject: Re: Slaton spam: Why don't we use our collective power?
> Date: Friday, August 18, 1995 8:55AM
