TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Correct usage of "quadrants" From:Kris Olberg <KJOlberg -at- AOL -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 18 Oct 1995 15:30:40 -0400
In a message dated 95-10-17 19:01:27 EDT, geoff-h -at- MTL -dot- FERIC -dot- CA (Geoff Hart)
> He insists the term is valid for
> referring to any number of regions. Any brave referees out
> there who can comment on this usage?
I feel for you on this one, Jeff. Sounds like no matter what you say you
won't convince the idiot that "quad" signifies four, not six or ten or 186. I
believe that our usage of "quad" is taken from the Latin "quadrans," which
means "quarter." But if this guy insists that 2+2 equals 5, try suggesting
another term such as "partition," "sector," "area," etc. Good luck.