Re: Numbering

Subject: Re: Numbering
From: John Posada <jposada -at- NOTES -dot- CC -dot- BELLCORE -dot- COM>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 15:56:29 -0400

John Posada asks about government numbering:

> Would I have been able to put a 2.1 if I hadn't used a 2.2?
> If not, how do I do a 2.1.1 and a 2.1.2 if I hadn't used a 2.2

The basic answer to the first question is yes. That's easy for
me to say because I write to government standards. I didn't like
this style at first, but I'm accustomed to it now, and I think that
it's superior for technical work.

I identify Section 2 (for example) as 2 (or 2.0) <SECTION HEADING>,
and I have no text under this heading if I can help it. That means
that I must have a paragraph 2.1 if I want to write anything even if
I don't have a paragraph 2.2. This might conflict with what we learned
in grammer school, but I like it. It's consistent, and it complies
with the standards.



It was specificaly BECAUSE of numbering to government standards that I was told
that you cannot have a 2.1 of there is no 2.2

They never even TOUCHED on numbering when I was in grammar school...was that
part of the New Math? (ga-head..tell me you're too young to even remember the
"New Math"

John Posada
Tech Writer
Bell Communications Research
jposada -at- notes -dot- cc -dot- bellcore -dot- com
(908) 699-5839

***I don't speak for my employer and they return the favor***

Previous by Author: Re: Visuals within a Proposal
Next by Author: Re: UNIX or Unix?
Previous by Thread: Re: Numbering
Next by Thread: Re: Numbering

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads