TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: web pages From:Tom Tadfor Little <tlittle -at- LANL -dot- GOV> Date:Wed, 22 Nov 1995 11:27:56 -0700
Wolf Lahti wrote:
> David Siegel's pages (http://www2.best.com/~dsiegel/tips/tips_home.html) are
> very pretty, but he makes them so by ignoring standards and using extensions
> in such a way that many of his design elements are wasted on and unviewable
> by anyone without the latest version of Netscape. He makes no apologies for
> this, coming across with an in-your-face attitude. Siegel's background is
> graphical page deisgn, and his emphasis is, predictably, on design rather
> than content, which is not what the Web is about--not at this stage, at any
In my opinion, this is a very harsh criticism. I visited Siegel's pages and
no evidence of an "in-your-face" attitude.
And although we're not likely to resolve the debate on using Netscape extensions
on this list, I think "ignoring standards" is a rather unkind way to describe
someone who designs pages with 80% of his visitors in mind. Netscape has become
a _de facto_ standard for the web. According to the official (read out-of-date,
out-of-touch, ivory-tower) HTML standard, you can't even make a table to put
two columns of text on the screen. I think respect for standards needs to be
tempered with a little realism. One could argue, for example, that software
not be distributed on high-density (1.4M) floppies, because single- and
double-density drives still exist out there. Yet such a policy would do more
Finally, I disagree with "Siegel's...emphasis is...on design rather than
Most of the suggestions he has on his page relate to making the content as
accessible as possible, and presume that a page's main deliverable is its text.
the comment was only meant to imply that the page is about design methods, I
agree--but that's pretty obvious. If the implication is that his design
recommendations compromise the content, I disagree vigorously.
This is not intended to start a holy war. I just think that at this point in the
evolution of the web, it is unfair to so strongly condemn a web site simply
because it was written with Netscape users in mind.
Tom Tadfor Little tlittle -at- lanl -dot- gov -or- telp -at- Rt66 -dot- com
technical writer/editor Los Alamos National Laboratory