TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Hobbys [sic] (and other stuff) on resumes (long!)
Subject:Re: Hobbys [sic] (and other stuff) on resumes (long!) From:TRACY BOYINGTON <trlyboyi -at- GENESIS -dot- ODVTE -dot- STATE -dot- OK -dot- US> Date:Tue, 2 Jan 1996 08:30:45 +0000
I originally wrote:
> >-- I want to see *perfect* spelling, grammar, and punctuation. It's
> >one thing to misspell a word or split an infinitive on this list (we
> >all do that!), it's quite another to do it on your resume.
Robert Plamondon replied:
> Since many of us, seasoned, eagle-eyed professionals that we are,
> can't avoid misspellings even when we are complaining about them,
> I hardly think that disqualifying applicants on the basis of a minor
> error or two is fair.
> But, more important than fairness, it discards writers who aren't
> good self-editors. Since most writers aren't good self-editors, I
> figure that focusing excessively on perfect execution will throw out
> those writers who revise their resumes for a given opportunity (which
> is otherwise considered to be a good practice), and favor those who
> write one, have someone edit it, and never touch it again.
> So I think that focusing on textbook perfection in a resume selects
> for over-fussiness and a low level of interest in the position, where
> someone who dashes off a new edition of his resume as soon as he hears
> about the job has already demonstrated valuable traits.
To which I say:
I'm not a perfect self-editor ("no kidding," said Robert, gleefully
chuckling over the subtle way he pointed out my mistake in the subject
line), and I don't discard writers/editors who don't have perfect
resumes. I work with some really talented people who (I hope) edit my
work better than they edited their own resume. But when I see a *resume*
that obviously wasn't even run through a spell-checker (yes, I KNOW
they don't catch everything, but you can tell when someone hasn't even
bothered to use one), I have to question that person's common sense and
quality standards, whether they're applying to be a writer, an engineer,
or a dog-walker. I guess my list of what I'd like to see on a resume was
more of a wish list than a list of expectations.
And I promise this will be my last post on this subject!
Technical Communication Specialist
Oklahoma Department of Vocational & Technical Education
I never express opinions, but if one slips out, it belongs
to me and not ODVTE.
"I think I did pretty well, considering I started out
with nothing but a bunch of blank paper."
-- Steve Martin