TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
At 03:51 PM 1/3/96 UT, Judith Blackbourn <JudiStaal -at- MSN -dot- COM> wrote:
>For many of you, this discussion seems to be theoretical; I'm taking it
>Here's my worry -- I don't have a college degree. So even though the local STC
>chapter has awarded me a Best of Show the last two years, I wouldn't be
>qualified for a certificate!
No-one ever said you'd have to have a degree before taking a
certification test. Just as a degree would not stand in lieu
of certification, certification would not stand in lieu of a degree.
They would be distinct items for employers to consider.
>Guess when the certification standards are in place, I wouldn't be able to
>enter my work in the competition anyway.
No-one ever said you'd have to have a certificate before entering an
>Guess it's time to start thinking about another career!
Don't lose your perspective. Certification is being discussed and debated.
If it is deemed valuable, then it will still take *years* before it could
be implemented and even longer before it would have a significant impact
on the profession.
On the other hand, I believe the time is ripe for this discussion.
LaVonna F. Funkhouser, COREComm |
lffunkhouser -at- halnet -dot- com (work) |
You are invited to browse our web site: | http://www.corecomm.com/corecomm/ |
My opinions do not officially represent anyone other than me.