TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Paying by the word From:K Watkins <KWATKINS -at- QUICKPEN -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 11 Jan 1996 13:41:00 -0300
Conflict of interest, indeed!
Upon request, as a demonstration, I once took twenty minutes to expand three
brief sentences from one of my own manuals - under 20 words - to be three
fairly long paragraphs, some 175 words. The original sentences were quite
sufficient for their purpose; everything I added (about $36 worth at $0.23
per word, or around $108/hour) was apparently germane but actually
I would never want to be in a position where the better I trimmed the fat as
I wrote, the less I got paid.
Anyone remember the quote I used on my first message in this group (source
still uncertain)? - "I am sorry to write such a long letter, but I did not
have time to make it shorter." This could be a new twist: "Sorry to
deliver such a verbose document, but my car engine needs rebuilding"!
kwatkins -at- quickpen -dot- com
speaking for myself, not my employers