Re: Validation (Was Artfully is dragging)

Subject: Re: Validation (Was Artfully is dragging)
From: Loryn Jenkins <loryn -at- OZEMAIL -dot- COM -dot- AU>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 17:26:40 +1000

How do you ensure that the Validator, who isn't an SME, is able
to pick up on all the details that an SME should?

rjl -at- bostech -dot- com wrote:
> Crazy as it sounds, the ideal Validator is a technical communicator,
> not an engineer. A tech communicator is able to look at the data with the
> right amount of distance, is able to view the document in the larger scope
> of all other documentation, and....well, I'm likely preaching the choir
> when I address the idea to this group.

Loryn


Previous by Author: Re: Pronouncing initialisms/acronyms (was: e-mail)
Next by Author: Re: conditional text
Previous by Thread: Validation (Was Artfully is dragging)
Next by Thread: TI hiring web authors?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads