Re: OO English

Subject: Re: OO English
From: "Susan W. Gallagher" <sgallagher -at- EXPERSOFT -dot- COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 11:19:42 -0800

At 12:49 PM 1/24/96, Tom Lange wrote:
> Tony, I agree with you. Passive does have its place, which you explain
> well. I think your actor oriented or object oriented idea is great.

Sorry, guys... It's not really object-oriented unless it supports
inheritance, encapsulation, abstraction, and polymorphism -- you
know, like C++ and Smalltalk??? OOPS! ;-)


-Sue Gallagher
sgallagher -at- expersoft -dot- com


Previous by Author: Re: What *is* user-friendly...
Next by Author: Re: Challenge to active-verb advocates
Previous by Thread: Re: What *is* user friendly
Next by Thread: Doc-To-Help and AV Macros Revisited


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads