TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: "See" and "Utilize" From:Beverly Parks <bparks -at- HUACHUCA-EMH2 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL> Date:Fri, 16 Feb 1996 07:43:40 MST
Kathy Fisher <KDFisher -at- aol -dot- com> wrote-->
> If I see the word "see" used ONE MORE TIME in documentation to reference
> another document I'm gonna lose my lunch! We "see" with our eyes. We
> "refer" to a document.
"See" references are very common in indexes; perhaps that usage
has migrated into the document. As long as what you are telling
the reader to "see" is contained within the same document, I
don't have a problem with it. But to say "see" when you are
referring them to a completely different document could be very
irritating. Especially when you don't have ready access to the
> I also wish the word "utilize" would be permanently banned and replaced with
> "use." The trend in technical writing is less is better. Why use
> $64,000-dollar words when a $5-dollar word will do the trick???
Agree completely. I've heard the argument that "utilize" means
to use something for a purpose for which it wasn't designed (as
in "I utilized a hair pin to pick the lock"), but it sounds
pompous any way you use it.
=*= Beverly Parks -- bparks -at- huachuca-emh2 -dot- army -dot- mil =*=
=*= "I am not speaking for my employer." =*=