TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Articles with Initialisms From:Sue Gallagher <sgallagher -at- EXPERSOFT -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 23 Feb 1996 12:28:54 -0800
At 05:10 PM 2/23/96 GMT, Katharine Woods wrote:
>I've had this (pronounciation) problem when documenting files
>by extension names. For
>example, ".INI" and ".EXE" files. Some people pronounce these as
>"dot ini" and "dot exe" (requiring an "a"), others as "ini" and "exe"
>(requiring an "an") and both groups get upset if the filename
>extension is preceded by the inappropriate article.
>Of course, this might just be a British thing. I've never heard
>heard anyone talk about "period exe" or "period ini" files. :-)
No, Katharine... You're not alone. I too wrestle with the difference
between "a dot-eye-enn-eye" file and "an innie" file all the time --
I'm never sure what to do. Most of the time, I try to recast the
sentence so that I can use the definite article instead -- 'cause
with "the", the pronounciation doesn't matter. Unfortunately, this
isn't always possible.
sgallagher -at- expersoft -dot- com