TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: MS Manual of Style- Tec From:"Huber, Mike" <Mike -dot- Huber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 27 Feb 1996 10:24:00 -0500
Oddly enough, it fails to suck completely. Few of the guidelines are bad.
It suggests avoiding the words "upsize" or "utilize".
Many of the things it covers are Microsoft artifacts. It's good for
to "what's the official name for that thing in the corner of the dialog?"
type questions. MS owns the interface - the official name is whatever
MS say it is.
It's best feature is the authority it carries in it's name. I've walked
from pointless standards debates saying "@#$! It - let's just do what the
MMoS says!" over my shoulder. What the MMoS says is just about sure
to be something I can live with (even if it's not exactly what I would
and corporate types don't like to argue with Big Bill.
From: Tony Rocco[SMTP:tony_rocco -at- navis -dot- com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 1996 8:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list TEC
Subject: Re: MS Manual of Style- Tec
A Microsoft manual of style? That's an oxymoron if ever there was one.
next, an Exxon guide to environmentalism? A Gingrich book on the practice
compassion? Pope Paul's guide to safe sex? Absurdity abounds in this day