TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Evolving language or laziness? From:"Colleen Dancer (02) 333-1862" <DANCER -dot- COLLEEN -at- A2 -dot- ABC -dot- NET -dot- AU> Date:Thu, 14 Mar 1996 13:38:00 +1100
Tim Alton writes:
Many companies are now scuttling into cobwebby holes
to avoid confronting angry feminists over "his" as the indefinite
pronoun. A lot of otherwise thoughtful people have suggested using "them"
as an acceptable substitute. Sorry, but I can't agree. I see using "them"
in singular applications as a "bump" that the user has to get over.
I don't consider myself an angry feminist, nor a particularly ardent one.
however I do find that I don't relate the pronoun His to me. I don't
think of the word mankind as being sexist, but I definitely find his or
he or the use of male examples only as annoying. I also find it
interferes with my comprehension, instead of taking in the data I find
myself saying "don't they think computer operators can be female?" I
much prefer using their, you, them or any of those words which don't
denote a sex. From talking to some of my other female colleagues, they
feel the same way. In other words you end up noticing the language
rather than the message. Which from a technical communicator's point of
view is bad.
I believe that political correctness can be taken too far and often is,
but I think that many females do not consider the pronoun "his" to be
Something else to consider: Whether a field is male or female dominated,
using sexist language; either his or her, makes it more difficult for the
minority sex to "break" into the field, it risks making them feel even
more alienated. Again not something I as a technical communicator want
dancer -dot- colleen -at- a2 -dot- abc -dot- net -dot- au
The opinions expressed are mine and not my employers.