TechWhirl Sponsors

---

 

TECHWR-L Mailing List Archive March 1996

---

1106 messages

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

aer

• What is SGML? answers
• Re: Royalties from TECHWR-L ???
• FrameMaker required; tips requested!
• FrameMaker required; tips requested!
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy

Alexander Adrian Szczepaniak

• Core Skills for Technical Communicators
• International Contracting?
• Technical Communicator Management
• Care & Feeding of Personal Business
• flowcharting (approaches & software)
• Re: qualifications for hiring tech writers
• Minneapolis Contract Rates et al.
• Pubs Charter & Employee Responsibilities

Alexander Von_obert

• liablility
• Documenting A Moving Target
• Tech Writing in Europe
• QA and Writer (was: Documenting A Moving Target)
• Interface design/field lengths
• Which is first: online or paper?
• Trends for Technical Communicators?
• How .pdf files are made
• liability

Alexandria G. Khalil

• Re[2]: Certification

Amy Statkevicus

• Documenting GUIs
• -No Subject-

Andrea Ames

• Writers Union?

Andrew W. Bray

• Internship opportunity in VA

Angela Howard

• Reporting to Marketing (was Certification)

Anne Weiler

• Re: help! ways to convert files to RTF for windows help?
• Mac Help Engines
• converting WinHelp RTF to Apple Guide
• Re: Need Release Notes Advice (fwd)

Arlen . P . Walker

• Re[2]: Electronic File Transfer
• Re[2]: Electronic File Transfer
• HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Re: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing
• Re[2]: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Re: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Re[2]: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing, Bounced E-m
• Re[2]: HTML Editors
• Re[2]: Royalties from TECHWR-L ???
• Re[2]: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Re[2]: all this copyright stuff
• HTML v Acrobat
• Re: Flowcharting Software
• Re: Certification: opposing views
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re[2]: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re[2]: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re[2]: To Do Archives
• Re[2]: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re[2]: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re[2]: Re. Magnum to-do lists
• Re[2]: British English in _tech writing_

ArtElser

• Gentle and constructive editing

asa

• Technical Writing Postion, Pittsburgh

Bachison, Cliff W. @ SLG

• Bounced E-mail

Barbara Hallnan

• Need Release Notes Advice (fwd)

Barbara Miller

• New Rocky Mountain Chapter Home Page
• Note: New Rocky Mountain Chapter home page
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat

Benjamin Milstead

• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat

Bernard A. McCann

• Re: Interleaf and Sun work stations
• TODAY'S PET PEEVE!
• SURVEY.

Beryl Doane

• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Gender Bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy & MS-Mail
• Developing Online Docs
• Re: Developing Online Docs
• Re: The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)
• Re: American / British English Indexing Request

Beth Jankowski

• Using Font Types
• Re: Chapter numbering & TOC
• A Preposition *WHERE*?
• Best Books
• Re: Project estimating and tracking
• Re: Frame ListServ
• Re: Mouses/Pointers & wrist problems
• Re: (Fwd) Re: Web publishers

Betsy Maaks

• Justification
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 24 Mar 1996 to 25 Mar 1996
• Passive/active voice in int'l documents

Bev Parks

• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Request Courteous Gran Poo Bah Signatures Please

Beverly Parks

• ADMIN: Digest idea
• Re: English is evolving.. what to do? what to do?
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy

Bill Bledsoe

• A question: and On subject too!
• Re: Windows Help Demise
• TC Employment Opportunities
• document database products?
• Re: Clickable bitmaps in online help: op

Bill Burns

• Re: A question: and On subject too! (#15205)
• Re: How to edit constructively? (#134903)
• Re: Questions on Softback Institute's Conference and Expo (#165262)
• Re: Re. Grammar vs. linguistics (#520668)
• Re: Evolving language or laziness? (#649158)
• Re: Evolving language or laziness? (#653920)
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness) (#772409)
• Re: British English in _tech writing_ (#19924)

Bill Sullivan

• Which is first: online or paper? -Reply
• How to edit constructively? -Reply
• Trends for Technical Communicators? -Reply
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 3 Mar 1996 to 4 Mar 1996 -Reply
• HyperHelp -Reply
• Re: posting TECHWR-L digests without permission -Reply
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators? -Reply -Reply
• Establishing a documentation process -Reply
• sanity check--please!! -Reply
• Interest and Learning (was no subject) -Reply
• Core skills for technical communicators -Reply
• Re: Converting HELP files to RTF files -Reply
• Re: Clickable bitmaps in online help: opinions?

Binion Amerson

• Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: quotation needed

Bob Morrisette

• HTML Editors
• Flowcharting Software
• FrameMaker Required
• FrameMaker Required

Bonni Graham

• Re: Certification
• Re: Full text searches
• Re: Full text searches - don't kick MS
• Re: Does QA Test Your Docs?

bphuettner

• Marketing vs Development (was RE: Certification)

Brad Barnes (T)

• Re: campaigning

Brad Connatser

• Re: English is evolving.. what to do? what to do?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: MWDEU on "impact" as a verb

brad_m

• ACM SIGDOC 96 CFP Extension
• Research on Wizards Requested

Brett . Peruzzi

• Re: Which is first: online or paper?

Bruce WHITE

• Re: Electronic File Transfer
• Re: Help tools and manuals
• OL Help books
• Re: Electronic File Transfer
• Re: Which is first: online or paper?

Bruni, Kathy

• Electronic publishing

burgamw1

• Re: Internet Use by Tech Writers
• April Meeting of Metro Baltimore STC

Candace Bamber

• Win-help and Word
• Techwr-l FAQ
• English and Formality for Tech Docs in Non-North American Markets
• Milton, Ontario, CANADA/ Intermediate Documentation/Training Specialist

Carl Lewis

• Help Files for International Users
• Japanese Online Help

Carl Rudorf

• Re: Pride of Ownership
• Re: WordPerfect Advice
• Online with IBM's BookManger
• Re: WP 6.1 Patch
• Creating Online Documentation for the AS/400
• Re: Gender Bias (was Evolving Language
• Re: Online with IBM's BookManager
• Re: AS/400 Online Help
• Re [2]: BookManager Source File Tags
• Re: Certification
• Frame Training
• Frame User Gds
• Frame ListServ
• Re: limitation on warranties and liability
• Re: best wording for cross references
• HumpDay Humor: If Dr Seuss wrote Doc

Carla Lotito

• File and graphics managing software

Carol A. McHale

• Agents in the Washington, DC area

Carol Anne T. Wall

• Re: sanity check--please!!
• Re: Workplace Productivity

caroline nachman

• daily journal helps keep track of many projects, ideas, notes.

CARYN_RIZELL

• Re: How to edit constructively
• Mouse Pointers and Wrist Problems
• User Centered Data

CATHERINE ICHIGE

• Technical Communicators on Software Development Teams

Cathy McNair

• Re: Mac Help Engines

Charles Cantrell

• Re: Pecentage of techwriters in relation to other employees
• Re: on custom-built documents & feature databases...
• Re: Re[2]: on custom-built docs & feature databases...
• Re: How much documentation for 1000 hours of programming?

Charles Good

• Re: Converting HELP files to RTF files
• Re: Internet Use by Tech Writers
• Re: Workplace Discrimination
• Re: To Do Archives

Chet Ensign

• Re: Electronic File Transfer
• Re: on custom-built documents & feature databases...
• Re: on custom-built docs & feature databases...
• Re: Online with IBM's BookManger
• Re: Framemaker required
• Impact of information explosion on our profession (Was: on custom-built documents & feature databases...)
• Re: Impact of information explosion on our profession
• Re: SGML and features database
• separating authoring and composition [was features db]
• Re: SGML and features database

Cheverie, Paul [Cont]

• Re: Pecentage of techwriters in relation to other employees
• Re: A Preposition *WHERE*?--Churchill again
• Re: Pubs Charter & Employee Responsibilities

Chris Hulin

• Re: HTML Editors
• Visual metaphors please
• To Listowner
• Re: International English
• Re[2]: British English in _tech writing_

Chuck Blessing

• Re: Technical Communicators on Software Development Teams
• Re: Technical Communicators on Software Development Teams
• Re: How much documentation for 1000 hours of programming?

chuckm

• Re: docs to development ratio
• Job ad: WWW Developer

Colleen Dancer (02) 333-1862

• Re: all this copyright stufff
• Pride of ownership
• Re: pride of ownership
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness
• Tim Alton
• 95 help and 3.1 help
• Re: Liability
• Re: Liability

copp

• Re: Doing your own art

Cornelisen, Renee @ SLG

• Do you do your own art?
• Do you do your own art?
• Query - Frame URL

CRADDOCK.KATHY

• Flowcharting Software
• Thanks
• Flowchart Recommendations

Dan Lupo

• Doc Design Research
• Doc Design Research Results (Long)

Dan S. Azlin

• Re: Doing your own art
• Re: Cost of Manuals--Interesting Phenomenon

Dana B. Mackonis

• Mark -dot- 2 -dot- Merkow -at- aexp -dot- com

Daniel E. Wise

• Request for Information
• Certification--Two Notes
• Diversity
• Editing Tests

Daniel Strychalski

• Important Skills

Danna Bethlehem

• self-running demo

Darryl Moody

• Re: Doing your own art

David Blyth

• HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Re: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Re[2]: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Zippy, no sig.
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: HTML vs Adobe Acrobat
• (Fwd) Re: Web publishers
• Web publishers
• Death of Paper

David Fisher

• Re: How to edit constructively?

David Ibbetson

• Re: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing, Bounced E-mail
• copyright
• copyright
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness), Re: Framemaker required
• Tests followed over a long period
• REs: Full text searches
• Re: Converting HELP files to RTF files
• chemical hoods
• Internet or library
• chemical hoods.

David J. Cross

• Job posting

David Jones/KSBEISD

• Re: Electronic File Transfer
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: Using Font Types
• Books on Documentation Development Process?
• Re: Royalties from TECHWR-L ???
• Re: Internet Usage By Tech Writers
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Discussion lists <> Gossip? - was [no subject]
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: Microsoft Word Group
• Re: Certification
• Re: Booklet Software Answers
• Re: Certification: opposing views
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: To Do Archives
• Re: Flowchart Recommendations
• Re: To Do Archives
• Re: Re[2]: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: liability
• Re: limitation on warranties and liability
• Re: Re. Death of paper
• Re: Re. Magnum to-do lists
• Re: Re. Magnum to-do lists
• Re: Re. Magnum to-do lists
• Re: Death of Paper
• Re: Death of Paper

David Sherwood

• Re: HTML Editors

David Somers

• Re: Workplace Discrimination
• Re: Workplace Discrimination
• Re: Visual metaphors please

David_Dubin

• CBT on the WWW or Lotus Notes

dblyth

• [no subject]

Deborah Wood

• Job Posting -- Sunnyvale, CA

Debra Kahn

• Opinions sought new pub/doc manage system

Dennis Hays/The Burden Lake Group, Ltd.

• Changing Tires at 60kph/Reprise (long)
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators? -Reply
• Copyright issue...
• Spinnin' Plates at 60kph/Reprise (long)
• Intriguing Question ...
• Reprise: 1,000 Hrs of Dev.=?Hrs Doc

DFIERRO

• Re: Visual metaphors AND all this copyright stufff

Diane K. Ritchey

• Booklet Software?
• Booklet Software Answers

Dianne Driskell

• Re: sanity check--please!!
• Re: Tips on ASCII/HTML resumes

Digitome Ltd.

• Re: Help tools and manuals

Dimock, Dick

• Rumors of LIST decline // OL Help books
• OL Help 3rd Party Books-Replies
• Style Guidelines
• Signatures in Manuals

Don Sargent

• Position in Northern VA

Donna_Menk

• Re[2]: Framemaker required

DonnaA844

• Re: HTML Editors and ISO documentation

dorselj1

• Liability

Doug Montalbano

• Standards for Cautionary Statements

DTN 522-6614, StorageWorks OEM Information Products 27-Mar-1996 1250 -0700

• Net lists/newsgroups for selling/buying software?

DTN 522-6614, StorageWorks OEM Information Products

• Job Market in Colorado

Emily Skarzenski

• Re: Establishing a documentation process
• Tips on ASCII/HTML resumes
• Re: Certification
• Need for new paradigm/toolset (Was: Impact of info expl...)
• Re: Hackos Software (correct URL)

Eric Brown

• all this copyright stuff
• copyright -- my last word (and you can quote me on this)
• Re: Internet Usage by Tech Writers
• Re: Indexing software for Word 5.1 (Mac)

Eric J. Ray

• Posting Guidelines for TECHWR-L
• Administrivia FAQ (Subscribing, etc.)
• Posting Guidelines for TECHWR-L
• Administrivia FAQ (Subscribing, etc.)

Eric Ray

• He/She
• FTP site/Bibliography
• Guidelines for Posting Messages

Erika Cilengir

• Tests to Screen Candidates for Tech Communicator Positions

FB

• Re: Help tools and manuals
• Re: Pecentage of techwriters in relation to other employees
• Re[2]: Cubicle Sweet Cubicle (was: Workplace Discrimination)

Frank . Harper

• [no subject]
• Re: Washington DC

Frederick Falk

• limitation on warranties and liability
• Post this please! (fwd)

Gaignard, Karen

• Need Example of Contract
• Creating Icon Files

Garret Romaine

• Portland, Oregon and Willamette Valley Job Information
• Re: copyright
• STC Conference
• Re: SURVEY.
• Re: disclaimers, warranties and liability

GCheski

• Week of Year
• Re: Week of Year

geoff-h

• Re. Editing gently and constructively
• Re. Keeping up with modern English
• Establishing a documentation process
• Re. HTML vs. Acrobat
• Re. Interface metaphor hype?
• Re. Grammar vs. linguistics
• Re. Internet copyrights?
• Re. Copyrighted e-mail
• Establishing a documentation process
• Re. Quick and dirty indexes
• Looking for work for a friend!
• Re. writing and liability?
• Re. Spurious secrecy... oops!
• Re. Spurious secrecy?
• Re. Death of paper
• Re. Magnum to-do lists

GFHayhoe

• Re: Sanity Check

GINGER JONES

• Computer Viruses (HUMOR)

Glenda Jeffrey

• How to edit constructively?
• Re: How to edit constructively?
• Re: On-Line Help User Data
• Re: On-Line Help User Data

Gordon Hayes

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 3 Mar 1996 to 4 Mar 1996
• Re: posting TECHWR-L digests without permission
• web posting of TECH-L (continued)
• copyright - posting TECH-L
• posting the list
• Royalties from TECHWR-L ???

Grant Hogarth

• Re: question for GraphicsConverter users
• Re: self-running demo
• Re: contractions in tech. writing
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Microsoft Word List
• Re: WANT: multiple-GIF viewing tool

Gravlin, Bob and Betty

• [no subject]
• Adobe Acrobat
• Re: WordPerfect Advice
• Online documents with BookManager

Greg Moser

• Manufacturing Manual Advise

Gretchen Toth

• Microsoft Word group

Guy McDonald

• Royalties from TECHWR-L ???
• Royalties & Such
• Sea Lawyers & Copycats
• Moving onto another topic...
• Re: Pride of ownership
• Re: pride of ownership
• Breeding Copycats
• Request Courteous Gran Poo Bah Signatures Please
• FUN STUFF
• Public Education & E-Mail: Private or Public Property?
• Re: writing and liability

Gwen Barnes

• Which is first: online or paper?
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Framemaker required
• Workplace Productivity
• HumpDay Humor: If Dr Seuss wrote Doc
• Subject : HumpDay Humor: If Dr Seuss wrote Doc Referen
• HumpDay Humor: If Dr Seuss wrote Doc
• Oops, sorry HumpDay Humor: If Dr Seuss wrote Doc

Hannah Draper

• [no subject]

Harry Foxwell - SE Sun Vienna VA

• Webliography?

HBOC Pegasus Med

• FROM JODIE

Helen Hegelheimer

• Re: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing
• Re: Week of Year
• docs to development ratio

Heli Roosild

• JOB-No.VA: Sr. Software Documentor

Henry J. Friedman

• Indexing software for Word 5.1 (Mac)

Henry Korman

• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Doc Design Research

Holly Jensen

• Re: WRITING INTERNSHIPS

Huber, Mike

• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language
• Re: Framemaker required

Ian Macdonald

• Re: style guidelines
• Re: all this copyright stufff
• Re: Internet Usage By Tech Writers

Jack Shaw

• Re: Bill Bledsoe's question, and another question...
• Re: QA and Writer
• Re: HTML Editors
• Any interest in a In-continent indexing workshop?
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Indexing workshop backtalk...
• Re: Visual metaphors...
• Re: rodent alternatives
• Re: Passive/active voice in int'l documents

James Desmond

• Job listings for San Diego
• Job Listings for Los Angeles
• Job Listing - Los Angeles
• Los Angeles & San Diego Jobs
• Job Listing - LA and San Diego

James M.Lockard

• Re: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Humor
• Icons: backtrack button
• Seattle info for conference-goers
• win31 vrs. win95 help

James Owens

• FWD: New Ventura Mailing List Available on CorelNET

james witkin

• Marketing Communications Help

Jane Bergen

• Which is first: online or paper?
• online or paper....conclusion
• Re: Making Manuals User Friendlier
• Re: Documenting GUIs
• Re: qualified writers (was: Framemaker required)
• Re: Certification
• Re: Re[2]: Certification
• Re: Certification: opposing views

Janet S. Myers

• Re: Which is first: online or paper?

Janet Valade

• Re: Chapter numbering and TOC
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: Writers Union?

Jared M. Spool

• Re: How to edit constructively?
• Visual metaphors
• CHI '96 Tutorial Choices

jeansonj

• Request for Information about Consulting

Jeff Moore

• New Name for Department

Jesse Kaysen

• Re: HTML Editors

Jim Grey

• Summary: Evaluating Online Help
• FrameMaker Required (Was: Re: Interleaf and Sun work stations)
• Re: FrameMaker Required (Was: Re: Interleaf and Sun work stations)
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: Impact of information explosion on our profession
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: Cubicle Sweet Cubicle (was: Workplace Discrimination)

Jim House

• Interleaf and Sun work stations

Jlrcgn

• sanity check--please!!

Joan Smith

• Re: posting TECHWR-L digests without permission

John Gear

• Cutesy Tutorials
• Scorned Feminists

John Gough

• Re: HyperHelp
• Re: Justification
• Re: Framemaker required

John Hedtke

• Re: Bickering/defamation (off topic/short) ...
• Re: Ancestor worship (was Tech writing in Europe)
• Ailiene Turner, Silicon Valley STC member
• Re: Royalties question
• Re: Sea Lawyers & Copycats
• Re: sanity check--please!!
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy & MS-Mail
• Re: Scorned Feminists
• Re: Workplace Discrimination
• Re: education and the profession
• Re: The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)

John Posada

• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators? -Reply
• Re: How to edit constructively?
• Re: File and graphics managing software
• Re: The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)
• Re: CBT on the WWW or Lotus Notes
• Re: The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)
• Re: Cubicle Sweet Cubicle (was: Workplace Discrimination)

John Russell

• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?

John T. Battalio

• call for papers--rhetoric of science

Johnny One Note

• An Idea Whose Time Has Come

Joyce Flaherty

• Re[2]: Electronic File Transfer
• Re[3]: HTML vs Acrobat
• Re[2]: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing
• Re[2]: Royalties from TECHWR-L ???
• Re: Internet Usage By Tech Writers
• security software
• Re: Creating Online Documentation for the AS/400
• Re: Online with IBM's BookManger
• Re: on custom-built docs & feature databases...
• Re[2]: FrameMaker Required
• Re[2]: Evolving language or laziness?
• MS Interactive Developer
• Re[2]: Icons: backtrack button
• Re: RTFM
• REs: Full text searches
• Re[2]: Developing Online Doc
• Re: Developing Online Docs
• Re[2]: Need for new paradigm/toolset (Was: Impact of info
• SGML and version control
• Re[2]: Impact of information explosion on our profession (
• good multimedia
• separating authoring and composition [was features db]
• Re[2]: on custom-built docs & feature databases...
• Re: SGML and features database
• SGML [features, attributes, relationships]
• Re: Re. Spurious secrecy?
• Re: MS Interactive Developer
• FWD Re[3]: SGML and features database
• Re[4]: SGML [features, attributes, relationships]

Joyce M. Luster

• THANKS FOR TIPS

Judith Rosenberg

• education and the profession

Julia Conforti

• online certificate program

Julie A. E. Tholen

• Re: The List's Decline
• usability testing
• Halifax-bound
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?

Julie Zagorski

• Re: Which is first: online or paper?

kaikow

• Re: RTF Versions

Karen Forrester

• Technical Writer Wanted
• Fax #: Technical Writer Wanted

Karen Gwynn/Datatel

• Re: style guidelines
• Re: Which is first: online or paper?
• Re: How to edit constructively?
• Re: Books on Documentation Development Process?
• Re: what to use as sample text
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Formal training
• Re: Online help

Karen Kay

• Including your address

Karen Molloy

• Job posting: Boston area

Karen Otto

• qualifications for hiring tech writers
• qualifications for hiring tech writers
• job opening in Spokane, WA

Karla McMaster

• Re: Developing Online Docs
• Re[2]: Developing Online Doc
• Re: Does QA Test Your Docs?

Kat Nagel/MasterWork

• Re: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing
• collaboratory
• Re: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing, Bounced E-mail
• Re: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing
• CHAT Re: ON or IN the Internet?
• Re: posting TECHWR-L digests without permission -Reply
• Re: sanity check--please!!
• Re: Internet Usage By Tech Writers
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• CHAT Re: Booklet Software Answers
• Re: Doc Design Research
• Re: HumpDay Humor: If Dr Seuss wrote Doc
• Re: Standards for Cautionary Statements

KATDREW

• Tech writing jobs in Phoenix?

Katharine Woods

• Re: English and Formality for Tech Docs in Non-North American Markets
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Framemaker required

Kathleen Walch

• quotation needed

Kathleen Walsh

• Re: HTML
• Re: HTML Editors
• Mouses/Pointers & wrist problems

Kathy Fisher

• Tech Writing in Houston
• How to edit constructively
• Re: Which is first: online or paper?
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 12 Mar 1996 to 13 Mar 1996
• Looking for Opportunities in Silicon Valley/SF Bay Area
• Looking for Opportunities in NC
• Looking for Opportunities in NM
• Re: Workplace Discrimination

Kelly Leydon

• Software Life Cycle/Functional Specifications-HELP!

Kelly Leydon (e-mail address: ampt1235 -at- amp -dot- com)

• [no subject]

kellyk

• best wording for cross references

Kent Newton

• Questions on Softback Institute's Conference and Expo
• Re: Questions on Softback Institute's Conference and Expo
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: QA and Writer (was: Documenting A Moving Target)
• English is evolving.. what to do? [etc.] (Long reply)
• copyright question-- the real reason for the outrage
• Interest and Learning (was no subject)
• Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: copyright
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Re: Interest and Learning (was no subject)
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Certification
• Re: Impact of information explosion on our profession
• Re: Impact of information explosion on our profession
• Re: Clickable bitmaps in online help: opinions?
• Re: How much documentation for 1000 hours of programming?
• JOB OFFER: Spanish and Italian Technical Translators

Kim Fawcett

• Re: liability

KnoxML1

• Re[2]: How to edit constructively

Kris Olberg

• Re: Online with IBM's BookManger
• Re: Online with IBM's BookManager
• Re: Help with compiling textbook index with Word
• Clickable bitmaps in online help: opinions?

Krista Van Laan

• Re: Tech Writing in Europe
• Re: He/she/they/them debate

Kristina Ricks

• How to edit constructively?

KTINY

• Knowledge Management Metazine

Larry Kunz ((919) 254-6395)

• Trends for Technical Communicators
• Core skills for technical communicators
• Scribes on the web

Laura J. Mulcahy

• Writing Class Info

Laura Myott

• Re: Contractions

LaVonna

• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat

LaVonna Funkhouser

• Employment Opportunities, Houston, TX, USA
• Worst TW winner for February
• Re: Zippy, no sig.
• Re: Tips on ASCII/HTML resumes
• Re: The Little Engine that Could & Sambo
• Internet citation guide
• Re: A Preposition *WHERE*?--Churchill again
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Do You Know European? <HUMOR>
• Re: Re. writing and liability?
• follow-up Re: Do You Know European? <HUMOR>

Leif Wennerberg

• Re: A Preposition *WHERE*?

Len Olszewski

• Re: SGML [features, attributes, relationships]

Linda McRae

• Re: sanity check--please!!

Linda Oestreich

• Windows Help Demise

Lisa Fitkin

• Rookie moves

Lise A Hansen

• email/list Copyright
• Re: Copyright

Lissa Roberts

• Salaries in Raleigh

Lori Lathrop

• Indexing Workshops
• Fantastic resource!
• Re: Quick and dirty indexes

Lorraine . Lawford-McWilliams

• Evolving language or laziness?

Louis Rondeau

• Survey - Proposed TECHNICAL WRITING Program

Margaret Packman

• Re: win31 vrs. win95 help

Maria Hunt

• Re: Evolving language or laziness?

Marilynne Smith

• I need some WordPerfect advice
• Re: The List's Decline
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators? -Reply
• Re: copyright - posting TECH-L
• Copyright
• Re: Online with IBM's BookManger
• Re: WordPerfect Advice
• [no subject]
• Re: Copyright
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Scorned Feminists
• Re: Online documents with BookManager
• Re: Online with IBM's BookManager
• Re: Online with IBM's BookManger
• Re: Copyright
• Re: The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)
• Re: Scorned Feminists
• Re: To Do Archives
• Re: (Fwd) Re: Web publishers
• Re: Workplace Discrimination
• Re: Workplace Productivity
• Re: chemical hoods
• Why isn't everyone posting?

Mark 2 Merkow

• Internet Usage By Tech Writers

Mark I Halpern

• connecting the "metaphor" and "linguistics" threads

Mark Levinson

• Re: Electronic File Transfer
• Re: Ceci n'est pas Dali
• Re: Contractions
• Wrist problems / RSI: Please leave Caroline Rose alone
• Re: To Do Archives
• List for FrameMaker users
• Re: Need Release Notes Advice (fwd)

Marsha Wolicki

• HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat

Marti Parks

• Re: SURVEY.

Marv Cochrane

• Re: Workplace Discrimination

Marvin W. Miller

• Re: Re. HTML vs. Acrobat

Mary Deaton

• Re: How much documentation for 1000 hours of programming?
• Was: How much documentation for 1000 hours

Mary Howe

• Re: Internet or library

Mary Howe/Rick Stein

• what to use as sample text

Matthew B. Epstein

• liability

Matthew B. Hicks

• Re: Mac Help Engines
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat

Matthew Danda

• Re: Frame Training

Melinda Carr

• Framemaker vs. Quark
• Framemaker vs. Quark Results
• Framemaker vs. Quark
• Online help

Melissa Hunter-Kilmer

• Ransom notes (was Web sites I will never visit again)
• Generic he *again*
• Full text searches
• British English in _tech writing_

Mercedes Abels

• Seminar in MissouriSeminar in Missouri
• Re: Scorned Feminists
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Seminar
• Registration form - Seminar
• Re: Re. writing and liability?
• Re: Writing and Layout

Michael Andrew Uhl

• Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing
• Copyright and TECHWR-L Postings
• How .pdf files are made
• Internet Usage By Tech Writers
• Interest and Learning --> Higher Salaries

Michael Hacker

• Job in Palo Alto

Michal Lastman

• contractions in tech.writing

Michele_Berkes

• WWW browsers and support for HTML 3.0

Mike Dannenberg

• FrameMaker+SGML
• Writing and Layout

Mike Hiatt

• online PIC meeting-STC Lone Star chapter

Mike McGraw

• WANT: multiple-GIF viewing tool, WWW lists

Mike Stiles

• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)

Monica L. Younger

• How do you use e-mail in the editing process?

MPgregor

• Re: Copyright issue...
• Re: all this copyright stuff

NAME \"Roger G. Legge\"

• Information Mapping
• Information Mapping
• Information Mapping and InfoMap
• Digests

Nancy Burns

• InterChange Conference/Boston

Nancy Hayes

• Re: HTML
• Re: Web sites I will never visit again
• Re: How to edit constructively?
• Re: "frosty" weather and "moving targets"
• Re: Copywrites and Newsgroups (Lists)
• Re: QA and Writer (was: Documenting A Moving Target)
• Re: The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)
• Re: education and the profession

Nancy Hoft

• Web Publishers

NANCY ICHIGE

• Recent changes or cases involving intellectual property and the technical writer.

Nancy McDonald contractor

• Re: Best Books

NIVA Inc.

• Spring '96 Issue: Writer's Block

Nora Merhar

• The List's Decline

Once more into the breach, dear friends...

• Re: Royalties from TECHWR-L ???

Paige A Medlin_ (PAM)

• Re: Workplace & Gender

Paul R. Sawyer

• on line tech writing classes. . .

Peter Gold

• Two birds, one stone (were: FrameMaker Required b/w Decline of Language)
• Re: Re[2]: on custom-built docs & feature databases...

Peter Kent

• Re: Which is first: online or paper?

Peter Ring, PRC

• Week of Year

Phil Hey

• Re: Manuals etc. on the Web
• Re: writing and liability

Pickett-Harner, Molly

• MWDEU on "impact" as a verb
• Re: Seminar

PIP Mailbox

• The List's Decline
• Making Manuals User Friendlier
• Making Manuals User Friendlier

Raymond Chenier

• Tech Writer job titles and industries...

Rebecca Filardo

• Lets take a poll - was Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)

Reinhard Jaehnig

• Re: Icons: backtrack button
• Re: Online with IBM's BookManager

Rhonda R. Sullivan

• Adobe Illustrator Training

Rich_VanDeventer

• New Member Biography
• CBT on the WWW or Lotus Notes

Richard Evans

• Re: Justification

Richard Farley

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 19 Mar 1996 to 20 Mar 1996
• Problems with sendings
• Formal training
• Wrist problems, RSI

Richard Foley

• Re: Wrist problems

Richard G Harris

• Re: Which is first: online or paper?

Richard Mateosian

• Re: campaigning
• Re: The List's Decline
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: Electronic File Transfer
• Zero-Search-Time Docs
• Re: How to edit constructively?
• Acrobat vs OS/2
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 3 Mar 1996 to 4 Mar 1996
• Re: Royalties from TECHWR-L ???
• Re: Visual metaphors
• Re: Visual metaphors
• Re: The List's Decline
• Re: Re. Grammar vs. linguistics
• Re: all this copyright stuff
• Re: copyright - posting TECH-L
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Re: FrameMaker required; tips requested!
• Re: Requesting Posting Courtesy
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Copyright
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: A Preposition *WHERE*?
• Re: English and Formality for Tech Docs in Non-North American Markets
• Impact of information explosion
• Re: Framemaker required
• Certification
• Re: Hang-up with the word "impact". Prescriptive usage?
• Re: Framemaker required
• Full text searches - don't kick MS
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Seminar
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: Do You Know European? <HUMOR>
• Re: Quick and dirty indexes
• Re: Hackos Software (correct URL)
• To Do Archives
• Re: Re. writing and liability?
• Re: Re. Magnum to-do lists
• How much documentation for 1000 hours of programming?
• Re: Liability
• Re: British English in _tech writing_
• Re: Fantastic resource!

Rick Lanser

• Re: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing

Rick Sapir

• Re[3]: Electronic File Transfer
• Re[3]: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Need Help: Department Name Change
• How to write a functional spec?
• Re: Developing Online Docs

Rick Stein

• Re: Workplace Discrimination

rjl

• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: Ransom notes
• Impact of information explosion on our profession
• Certification
• Re: Converting HELP files to RTF files
• Re. writing and liability?
• Re: writing and liability

Robert Plamondon

• Re: Justification
• Re: Interleaf and Sun work stations
• Re: Interleaf and Sun work stations
• Re: Pecentage of techwriters in relation to other employees
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: Interleaf and Sun work stations
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: on custom-built documents & feature databases...
• RTFM
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: New Name for Department
• Re: The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)

Roger Gerbig

• [no subject]

Ron Rhodes

• Re: Microsoft Word Group
• Hang-up with the word "impact". Prescriptive usage?

Ron Rothbart

• Pecentage of techwriters in relation to other employees
• Does QA Test Your Docs?

Ronald Lee Stone

• Type Was Made To Be Read
• correction: Type Was Made To Be Read
• Aristotle and the Internet seminar

Ruth Glaser

• style guidelines
• Tech Writing Rates in MPLS
• Tech Writing Rates in MPLS

Sally Derrick

• Graphics on NT

Sally M Martin

• Jobs: Pacific sunsets,fuchsia-shrouded alleys,snazzy new doc

Sally Yeo

• Re: HTML Editors
• Re: File and graphics managing software
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Mouses/Pointers & wrist problems
• Re: document database products?
• Re: How much documentation for 1000 hours of programming?

SANDRA CHARKER

• Re[1]: Making Manuals User Friendlier
• Re: Justification

sass nielsen

• Re: Maria Hunt/Tim Altom

scot

• Re: Re[2]: Electronic File Transfer
• HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• [no subject]
• key strokes
• win31 vrs. win95 help
• Full text searches
• helper apps (was HTML vs Acrobat)
• Update on PUB$ Estimator URL

sgallagher

• [no subject]

Sharon Gunason

• Re: TECHWR-L Digest - 20 Mar 1996 to 21 Mar 1996
• mea culpa and bio

Sigrid A. Schoepel

• Workplace Productivity

Smith, Amy

• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: STC Conference/Microsoft field trip
• Re: Mouses/Pointers & wrist problems

soundy

• Re: Re[2]: Electronic File Transfer
• Re: Re[3]: Electronic File Transfer
• Re: Acrobat vs OS/2
• Re: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Re: English is evolving.. what to do? what to do?
• Re: acrobat...
• Framemaker knuckles under.
• Re: Icons: backtrack button
• Re: self-running demo
• Re: TODAY'S PET PEEVE!

STACEY KAHN

• Re: Developing Online Doc
• Re: Writers Union?

Stan Brown

• Re: style guidelines
• Re: posting TECHWR-L digests without permission
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: two URLs point to same file

Starr, Mike

• Re: Clickable bitmaps in online help: op

Stephan Andraksen

• Re: copyright -- my last word (and you can quote me on this)
• (Fwd) Re: Web publishers

Stephen Arrants

• Re: The Hackos Software

Stephen Victor

• Re: Justification

Steve Delanghe

• You can't please all the people. Formerly: FrameMaker Required
• Re: English and Formality for Tech Docs in Non-North American Markets
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: win31 vrs. win95 help

Steve Osvold

• Writing to accommodate Windows 3.1 and Win95

STEVEN HOLLANDER

• Re: Tests to Screen Candidates for Tech Communicator Positions

Steven J. Owens

• Re: Object Oriented?
• Re: Impact of information explosion on our profession
• Re: Do You Know European? <HUMOR>

Stewart Walker

• What to call someone who answers questions
• Developer/writer ratio

straydog

• Junior Tech Writer +

Stuart Burnfield

• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Visual metaphors
• "frosty" weather, "moving targets" and sandwiches
• Re: Sanity Check
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Manufacturing Manual Advise

Stuart Selber

• Job Announcement/Clarkson/Upstate NY
• Re: Visual metaphors

Sue Ellen Adkins

• Screen Captures in a Document

Susan Kloster

• HTML Editors
• Re: HTML Editors
• Re: HTML Editors

Susan Schulken

• Seeking Recommendations on Tools

Susan Seifert

• Re: Which is first: online or paper?
• Re: How to edit constructively?

Susan W. Gallagher

• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: Which is first: online or paper?
• Re: style guidelines
• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators? -Reply
• Re: How to edit constructively?
• Re: Which is first: online or paper?
• Re: Contractions
• Re: QA and Writer
• Re: Establishing a documentation process
• [no subject]
• Re: Interest and Learning (was no subject)
• Re: Converting HELP files to RTF files
• Re: Converting HELP files to RTF files
• Re: On-Line Help User Data
• Re: SURVEY.
• Re: SURVEY OOoooops!
• Re: Mouses/Pointers & wrist problems
• Re: Clickable bitmaps in online help: opinions?
• Re: Cubicle Sweet Cubicle (was: Workplace Discrimination)
• Re: On-Line Help User Data
• Re: Visual metaphors...
• Re: User Centered Data
• JOB 4 NERD--SAN DIEGO
• Re: writing and liability (*way* long!)
• Re: WANT: multiple-GIF viewing tool, WWW lists
• Re: On-Line Help User Data

Susan Whitlow

• Writing Tutorials

Sushil Oswal

• Use of passive voice in scientific writing

Suzanne Lee

• question for GraphicsConverter users

SUZANNE PYLE

• [no subject]

Tammy Sudol

• Signatures in Manuals
• SGML Conference - Ottawa, Canada
• On-line Help for Our Products

Tara Barber

• Contractions
• Editing gently but productively

TChiricost

• Job Posting in Wash, DC

The Tech Writer

• Worst technical writing competition

Theresa Marchwinski

• Looking for Judges

Thiessen, Christopher(Chris) E

• Re: Need Release Notes Advice (fwd)

Thom Remington

• liability

Tim Altom

• Re: Windows Help Demise
• Re: HTML Editors
• HyperHelp
• Re: all this copyright stuff
• Re: FrameMaker Required (Was: Re: Interleaf and Sun work stations)
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Internet Usage By Tech Writers
• Re: Evolving language or laziness? (#653920)
• Re: FrameMaker Required
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: contractions in tech.writing
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Scorned Feminists
• Re: Gender Bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: on custom-built documents & feature databases...
• Re: Internet Usage by Tech Writers
• Re: Framemaker knuckles under.
• Re: Re[2]: FrameMaker Required
• Workplace Discrimination
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: Windows Help Decompiler
• Re: help! ways to convert files to RTF for windows help?
• Re: English and Formality for Tech Docs in Non-North American Markets
• Re: Workplace Discrimination
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Impact of information explosion on our profession (Was: on custom-built documents & feature databases...)
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: Hang-up with the word "impact". Prescriptive usage?
• Women in the Technical Workplace
• Re: win31 vrs. win95 help
• Full text searches
• Project estimating and tracking
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Project estimating and tracking
• The Hackos Software
• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Re: Need for new paradigm/toolset (Was: Impact of info expl...)
• Re: HTML Editors and ISO documentation
• Re: Converting HELP files to RTF files
• Re: Certification--Two Notes
• Re: Developing Online Doc
• Re: Tests to Screen Candidates for Tech Communicator Positions
• Re: Hackos Software (correct URL)
• Update on PUB$ Estimator URL
• Re: Clickable bitmaps in online help: opinions?
• International English
• Re: International English
• Re: International English
• Re: British English in _tech writing_

Tim Giles

• [no subject]

timmerman

• Re: Net lists/newsgroups for selling/buying software?

tina (c.l.) klein

• on custom-built documents & feature databases...
• Re: on custom-built documents & feature databases...
• Need for new paradigm/toolset

Tom Lange

• Re: Trends for Technical Communicators?
• Re: Workplace Discrimination

Tony Ioven/Voice Processing Corp

• Re: Technical Communicators on Software Development Teams
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Full text searches

Tony Rocco

• Re: Trends for Technical Com
• Re: FrameMaker Required (Was
• Re: Information Mapping and
• RE-RE-FrameMaker Required
• FWD>Frame User Gds

Tracy Boyington

• Re: HTML v. Acrobat (was Electronic File Transfer)
• Re: HTML Editors
• Re: copyright - posting TECH-L
• Need advice about authoring tools
• Re: Evolving language or laziness?
• Re: Gender bias (was Evolving language or laziness)
• Re: Framemaker required
• Re: Framemaker required

Tracy_Heldt

• On-Line Help User Data

Trey Jones

• English is evolving.. what to do? what to do?
• Re: English is evolving.. what to do? what to do?

Unknown

• [no subject]

Valerie J. Archambeau

• Re: How to edit constructively?
• Re: Flowcharting Software

Vester Scott

• Re: The List's Decline

Victor Chapel

• Workplace Productivity
• Regarding Functional Specifications
• Re: How much documentation for 1000 hours of programming

Vincent Reh

• Re: workplace discrimination

vmathews

• (U)

W. Michaels

• Re: Cubicle Sweet Cubicle (was: Workplace Discrimination)

WandaJane Phillips

• Re: Creating Macintosh on-line Help
• Re: Which is first: online or paper?
• Re: Death of Paper
• Re: Death of Paper

Warren Turner

• Re: New Member Biography
• Re: CBT on the WWW or Lotus Notes

wburns

• Re: Visual metaphors (#479678)
• Re: Ceci n'est pas Dali (#500397)

Wendy Warren

• Help with compiling textbook index with Word

William=E . =Newkirk%Pubs%GenAv . Mlb

• Re: The Little Engine that Could (was Re: Scorned Feminists)

Win Day

• Re: Distributing Postcript Files for Viewing, Bounced E-mail
• [no subject]
• Re: Interest and Learning (was no subject)
• Re: Certification: opposing views
• Re: To Do Archives
• Re: Re. Spurious secrecy?
• Re: Standards for Cautionary Statements

word

• Introduction
• Software Configuration Terms

Yvonne DeGraw

• Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
• Marketing your services (and a quick Sambo's note)
• Re: Web publishers

---

Author Index (Switch to Thread Index)

---

---

---