TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat From:David Blyth <dblyth -at- QUALCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 25 Mar 1996 13:05:46 -0700
>>Adobe does _not_ connect to the Internet except via a browser.
>InternetLink is an extension (plug-in) for Adobe Acrobat Exchange 2.0.
Arlen's right. I should revise my statement to read....
Adobe does _not_ connect to the Web except via a browser.
Adobe does _not_ connect to the Internet, except via a helper.
>Yes, it still means you have two applications running. (I don't know about
>the rest of you, but my system doesn't have any problem keeping an idle
>Acrobat reader running in the background when I'm working with something
Why spend the RAM when you don't have to? Not all of us have that much
RAM. I get all of the same functionality as Adobe Acrobat with Netscape 2.0
(or MS Internet Exploder 3.0) plus Adobe Amber - plus I get all of:
o NewsWatcher without spending more RAM
o Gopher without spending more RAM
o FTP without spending more RAM
o A Eudora-like mailer (I admit it!) without spending more RAM
Plus I can read (but not write):
o Word files without spending more RAM
o Excel files without spending more RAM
o MacroMedia Director files without spending more RAM
o Movies, audio, animation, 2 more Multimedia packages, and Java files
(plus some other stuff I forget) without spending more RAM
One detects a subtle pattern here. Netscape 2.0 is an Operating System
to the Internet. Adobe Acrobat 2.0 is not. If I use Netscape 2.0,
I get all of the above for about 7.5 Mbytes RAM. If I use Adobe Acrobat,
I get all of the above for:
3+ Mbytes RAM for Adobe Acrobat
4.0 Mbytes RAM for Excel
3+ Mbytes RAM for Word
2+ Mbytes RAM for Eudora
7.5 Mbytes RAM for Netscape (to connect to the Web anyway)
I have 16 Mbytes of RAM - and I use all of it already. Why should I
switch to Adode Acrobat when I can still read PDF files for free?
David Blyth - Web Site Developer
Standard disclaimers apply (obviously)