TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat From:David Blyth <dblyth -at- QUALCOMM -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 25 Mar 1996 17:26:35 -0700
>> BTW, if you're using Netscape, try turning off image loading
>> altogether (Options --> Autoload images).
>You missed the point. The imagemaps were the *only* navigation.
It sounds like you're suggesting that HTML encourages bad document
design. Is that correct?
>My theory is that Acrobat is generally used by people who know
>what they're doing and care about the outcome.
Yup. And this is one reason why Tech Writers should get more
involved in HTML - the people who are currently driving much
of the documentation on the Web don't know what they're doing.
But I think the Web is where things are going - and the Web is
dependent on HTML, not Acrobat.
In the meantime, many managers are calling for XXXX --> Web
conversions while blissfully convinced that the same people
who wrote and botched the hard copy documents will magically
create great Web documents - just because "Web" was added as
I'm trying to change the trend by becoming intimately involved
with it. I'm willing to become an Engineer if it helps me become
a better Technical Writer.
>> This is precisely my point. "Both/And" is absolutely the way to go.
>Interesting how this discussion has changed from "You should only use HTML"
>to "Use Netscape instead of Acrobat."
I don't believe I've ever said "you should only use HTML". Instead,
I've explicitly recommended Adobe Amber several times. That means a
Tech Writer will also have to use PDF. You _can_ use only HTML, but
this is not necessarily a good choice.
But I will say that the Web is driven by HTML, not PDF. I'm
guessing that Arlen and I agree on this.
Where Arlen and I disagree _might_ be on whether or not this is A
Good Thing. I'll let Arlen state his opinion. Mine is that this is
A Good Thing because:
o On-line help has shifted from being dependent on its relationship
to paper to being dependent on its relationship to the computer
(or to the Internet).
o PDF still focuses on making information look paper-like.
o HTML is designed to display information on the Internet, not paper.
To criticize HTML because it doesn't create paper-like documents
is to misunderstand the intent.
The bottom line is my conviction that paper is gradually being replaced
by the Internet. And I continue to be dedicated to communicating
technical content on the medium of choice.
David (The Man) Blyth
Web Site Designer