Re: Framemaker required

Subject: Re: Framemaker required
From: Richard Mateosian <srm -at- C2 -dot- ORG>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 18:56:38 -0800

>We as techwriters might *get* a little more respect if we *gave* a
>little.

Good point.

Being in this business forces us to learn detailed information about
unfamiliar fields and explain it to others. We can fall into the trap of
mistaking ourselves for experts on subjects we really know only
superficially. ...RM

Richard Mateosian Freelance Technical Writer
srm -at- c2 -dot- org Copyright 1996 Review Editor, IEEE Micro
http://www.c2.org/~srm/ All rights reserved President, Berkeley STC


Previous by Author: Re: Seminar
Next by Author: Re: Framemaker required
Previous by Thread: Re: Framemaker required
Next by Thread: Re: Framemaker required


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads