Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat

Subject: Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
From: Benjamin Milstead <guilden -at- IQUEST -dot- NET>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 12:58:00 EST

>That doesn't make much sense. It's rather like saying you've lost audience
>because you've put your graphics in a format that can only be read by a
>helper application.

Yes, this is precisely my point.
Cheers,
Ben Milstead




>>However, you've lost some extensibility and audience by not
>>converting to HTML. To what extent you've lost it depends upon the
>>content and purpose of your documents, but the fact remains that
>>far more Web users use Netscape than they do Acrobat Reader.


Previous by Author: Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
Next by Author: Re: Interleaf and Sun work stations
Previous by Thread: Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat
Next by Thread: Re: HTML vs. Adobe Acrobat


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads