TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Certification From:"Alexandria G. Khalil" <akhalil -at- SUNGARD -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 20 Mar 1996 11:56:02 EST
What kind of experience were you looking for when you posted the
position? If it was an entry level position I would have interviewed
the two individuals you mentioned. I think it shows initiative and
guts to apply for a position you are not quite qualified for but are
willing to learn about. I hired two individuals who had no or very
little experience in the trade. I trained them and they worked out
great. When I was hired for my first technical writing job 5 years ago
I had no technical writing experience and had never used a desktop
publishing package. My manager thought I had potential and hired me.
I'll take someone with initiative and desire to learn over anyone with
a certificate. I think you made a mistake not interviewing those
individuals, you might have found a couple of gems.
SunGard Capital Markets
akhalil -at- sungard -dot- com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Certification
Author: janeb -at- answersoft -dot- com at Internet
Date: 3/20/96 11:11 AM
> >On our last attempt at hiring writers, we got one from a man who
> >had written "procedures for carrying out duties while in the army"
> >and another whose sole experience was "wrote a manual on bowling."
> >We've talked (and whined) a lot about the issue of certification on
> >this list, but I support it 100%. Until we start taking ourselves
> >and our education seriously, we can't expect our employers or the
> >general public to do so, either.
> I certainly agree, as Larry Kunz keeps saying, that we need to take
> ourselves seriously if we expect others to take us and our
> profession seriously.
> No amount of certification, however, will necessarily induce
> employers to change their hiring practices. If they get a product
> they're happy with from someone they're paying peanuts to, why
> should they pay more.
> You can't legislate respect and demand for quality. If the end user
> doesn't insist on it, if the client doesn't care about it, there's
> no way you can charge a premium for it. ...RM
I don't remember this being about "pay" --- the point I was trying to
make was that if a PROSPECTIVE employer wants to ensure that he or
she is sifting out unqualified APPLICANTS, certification would
certainly help. I'm sure that some certified applicants could
conceivably be not-so-good writers .... and the reverse could also be
true, that some good writers may not be certified..... but it does
seem to be a better alternative than the current situation.
Jane Bergen, Technical Writer
janeb -at- answersoft -dot- com or janeb -at- airmail -dot- net
"The difference between the right word and the
almost right word is the difference between lightning
and the lightning bug" (Mark Twain)