TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:"Functionality" is the least of our worries From:Pam <pam -at- SAMMY -dot- PLS -dot- OV -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 23 May 1996 09:54:30 -0700
In response to Paul's inquiry:
Howdy! Can I get some opinions on using the word "functionality?"
As an English major first, and tech writer second, I'll admit that the "cringe
factor" is rather low for that particular word. It's used a lot in software
documentation, and yes, I agree with Paul that it's a word that's "evolved" into
the language and a word I consider to be specific to the computer industry. I can
live with it.
The word that evokes the BIG cringe is "optionally": "Optionally perform steps 3
and 4." Ouch!
Can someone please justify the existence of this word? If not, join me in stopping
its toxic spread.
Just another voice for the ethical treatment of words.
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net