TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> what an utterance means. *Functionality* is a root with two suffixes,
> that it has shifted from one syntactic category to another and back again.
> Could that throw some readers? Possibly.
Loved Bill's response. I would like to add that in most of realms (contexts?)
that most of us use "functionality", it is already a much-bandied word. And
using it a) saves time and space b) tells the user that you talk the talk. As
for using it in contexts that it is not much-seen already (likes simple user
handouts for use by *all* types of users), well, I should just humbly suggest
one thing: DON'T.
2209 15th Street ashrafs -at- rpi -dot- edu
Troy, NY 12180 www.rpi.edu/~ashrafs
(518) 274 9562
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net