TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Paper documentation fonts From:Marci Abels <maa5906 -at- CCP -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 21 Jun 1996 07:26:11 -0500
Thanks to everyone who responed to my plea for sources for font readability
in print documentation. It's been a big help. For anyone who might care for
a copy of the sources I was sent, here is what has accumulated so far:
Microsoft's Technical Manual Style
Elements of Style.
"Designing with Type: A basic course in typography." (James
Craig,Watson-Guptill Publishing, NY, 1971)
This book includes a chapter entitled, "How Do We Read?" On serif vs.
sans serif (p. 123):
"Looking Good in Print: A Guide to Basic Design for Desktop Publishing," by
Roger C. Parker, Ventana Press, isbn 1-56604-047-7. However, almost any
book on desktop publishing will comment on he issue.
Type & Layout, by Colin Wheildon ISBN 0-9624891-5-8. 1995, Strathmoor Press
(2550 Ninth Street, Suite 1000, Berkeley, CA 94710)
Lindsay J Rollo:
Tinker, Miles A. 1963 _Legibility of Print_, Ames: Iowa State University
Press Tinker summaries a vast range of research on various aspects of
legibility of print, including some of his own work. Tinker comments
particularly on the advantages of serif type as measured by speed of reading.
Hvistendahl, J. K. and Kahl, M. R. 1975 _Roman versus Sans Serif Boy Type;
Readability and Reader Preference_ New Research Bulletin No. 2, Washington:
American newspaper Publishers Association. This paper records reader's
preferences for serif type.
Wheildon, C. 1990 (rev. edit) _Communicating: Or Just Making Pretty
Shapes_, Newspaper Advertising Bureau of Australia Colin Wheildon's
research clearly shows serif type is superior for comprehension.
Writing and Designing Manuals, by Gretchen Holstein Schoff and Patricia A.
Robinson (1984), mentions, in its chapter on Format/Layout, that
"readability studies indicate that most people perceive it [sans serif
type face] harder to read.
The PC is not a Typewriter, Robin Williams, Peachpit Press.
Thanks again for the help. It's really appreciated,
Marci Abels maa5906 -at- ccp -dot- com
The trouble with our times is that the future is not what it used to be.
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net