TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: In vs. Into From:"Parks, Beverly L." <parksb -at- HUACHUCA-EMH7 -dot- ARMY -dot- MIL> Date:Fri, 21 Jun 1996 07:44:00 MST
John Glenn wrote:
>>Anyone (beside/besides?) me notice how ^into^ is
being (incorrectly) replaced by ^in^? Not only
in advertisements (which have us Lite, Nite, etc.)
but in ^acceptable^ sources (e.g. Readers' Digest
articles, professional mags - Inter -at- ctive Week
et al - and formerly award winning newspapers.<<
I wouldn't worry about in vs. into in a magazine that can't even find the
a on their keyboard. ;-)
Post Message: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Get Commands: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "help" in body.
Unsubscribe: LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU with "signoff TECHWR-L"
Listowner: ejray -at- ionet -dot- net