Re: Grammar Checkers

Subject: Re: Grammar Checkers
From: John Glenn <sfarmh1 -at- SCFN -dot- THPL -dot- LIB -dot- FL -dot- US>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 08:45:12 -0400

Surely. I used RightWriter, originally from Sarasota FL. Easily
configured. UNLIKE the Grammatik (sorry for the spelling) grammar
check utility, RightWriter proofed the document, THEN presented a
list of suggestions. I loathe the -interactive- Grammatik; it halts
when it finds something it suspects is incorrect, so I must babysit
the [expletive deleted] thing. Naturally, MS in its wisdom, included
either Grammatik or a look-alike into Word V6 and V7. If anyone
has information about RightWriter for Windows (preferably 95), please
let me know. I'll wager RightWriter knows the difference between
*its* and *it's* and between *in* and *into.* (And where to put the
peiod -- inside or qutside the quote.)

john glenn <sfarmh1 -at- scfn -dot- thpl -dot- lib -dot- fl -dot- us>
==================================================== not make a statement that cannot be easily
understood on the grounds that it will be understood
eventually. (Hillel)

TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-

Previous by Author: In vs. Into
Next by Author: Recovery plans -Help!
Previous by Thread: Grammar Checkers
Next by Thread: Re: Grammar Checkers -Reply

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads

Sponsored Ads