TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Information Mapping - V From:Tony Rocco <tony_rocco -at- NAVIS -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 27 Jun 1996 14:55:46 U
RE>>Information Mapping - V 6/27/96
Yes, it is entertaining. You wrote it well. I wasn't criticizing your
writing, just the use of it certain contexts. Incidentally, I am lightened
up. I am not taking this as seriously as you think. Thanks.
Date: 6/27/96 14:51
To: Tony Rocco
From: mjwing -at- ingr -dot- com
>From: Tony Rocco[SMTP:tony_rocco -at- navis -dot- com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 27, 1996 9:21 AM
>To: Wing, Michael J; Multiple recipients of list TEC
>Subject: Re: Information Mapping - V
> RE>>Information Mapping - VCR
>I would not want to write a sys admin reference in the manner you
>here. Your style is great for the intended audience, but as I mentioned
>previously, most audiences are not technophobic dunces, as you assume
>typical VCR user is.
Lighten up Tony. Where did I advocate using the procedure (If anyone,
as a result of my last post, is using this manner now -- Please
Stop!!). It was an example of how I perceived the philosophy that
Technical Writers should write more entertainingly. I only seemingly
assumed that the audience was "dummies" in the second procedure, the
first was straight-forward.
By the way, despite the "dummied-down" approach, was it entertaining?
>_/ Michael Wing
>_/ Principal Technical Writer
>_/ Jupiter Customization and Educational Services
>_/ Intergraph Corporation
>_/ mjwing -at- ingr -dot- com
>Date: 6/27/96 14:04
>To: Tony Rocco
>From: mjwing -at- INGR -dot- COM
>>> In making his case that technical writing is not and should not be
>>> entertaining Bill Hartzer says:
>>>> "If Technical Writing was entertaining
>>>> reading, 99 percent of Americans would know how to program their VCRs!"
>>> That's exactly the point Bill; if user manuals weren't so deadly dull,
>>> and unimaginative, if they better served the needs of the user, people
>>>know how to program their VCRs.
>Okay, let's try two procedures for setting the VCR timer.
>1) Press the PROG button (located at the far left of the control panel)
> The Program Menu displays.
>2) Press the "^" button until the Clock Set menu item highlights.
>3) Press Enter
> The Time Set displays as follows:
>4) In sequence, enter in the correct time from the numeric keypad
>(located directly to the right of the PROG button).
>5) Press 1 for A.M. or 2 for P.M on the numeric keypad.
>6) Press Enter
> The time is set
>Procedure 2 (Get rid of that annoying blink)
>We are now entering the mysterious world of VCR programming.
>1) Press the PROG button (one of those buttons that you always wondered
> Presto! The Program Menu appears.
>2) Press the "^" button. Trust me, it won't mess up a thing. Keep
>pressing until the Clock Set item is highlighted. (You can stop
>3) Press Enter
> Whoa, what happened to the screen? It says that it's 12:00.
>fret, that's the
> annoying 12:00 that has been blinking since you bought the VCR.
>4) Check your watch (you did change the batteries, didn't you?) and use
>the numeric keypad (and you thought it was a calculator) to enter the
>current time. Hurry or the time will no longer be current.
>5) Press 1 for A.M. or 2 for P.M on the numeric keypad. Check outside
>to determine if it is before or after noon.
>Note: By the way, I have no idea whether 12:00 is A.M. or P.M. Best
>just to wait another minute.
>6) Press Enter
> The blink has stopped and you're now a genius.
>Obviously, my entertaining procedure is extreme; however, this is what
>comes to mind when someone says we must be entertaining. Please, feel
>free to modify either example to show me the difference between dull,
>entertaining, and cutesy.
TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-