TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
"HTML 3.2 is W3C's new specification for HTML, developed
together with vendors including IBM, Microsoft, Netscape
Communications Corporation, Novell, SoftQuad, Spyglass,
and Sun Microsystems."
HTML 3.2 adds formal definitions for tables (a fairly limited
subset of current use), font sizes and colors, client-side
image maps, applets (for Java support), text flow around images,
and superscripts and subscripts.
In fact, features supported by "experimental" browsers did not
make it into HTML 3.2.
>The major downside of HTML 3.2 is that it is not downwardly (sidewaysly?)
>compatible with N-HTML or HTML 2.0. That is, HTML 3.2 _requires_ 3.2
>developers to insert a line that reads (basically) "I am only going to
>use HTML 3.2 for this file".
If you read http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Wilbur/features.html,
you will see that the <!DOCTYPE> declaration, which I assume you
are talking about, is *not* required. It has always been an
optional part of HTML and it not new. It's a reflection of HTML's
The <!DOCTYPE> tag is almost always ignored by browsers. Browsers
simply interpret the tags and attributes they understand and
ignore the rest. Some authoring tools and search robots examine
the <!DOCTYPE> declaration. I don't see a problem here.
>Thus, the HTML 3.2 notes explicitely state that it's up to the developers
>(Netscape and Microsoft) to build a browser that works with both HTML 3.2
>_and_ their own HTML dialects. That's a heck of a lot of work. How much
>return will they get?
Netscape already does support it. They had a lot of control
over the development of the spec. So, there's no work involved
Yvonne DeGraw, Technical Services o Web Authoring
yvonne -at- silcom -dot- com o Technical Writing http://www.silcom.com/~yvonne/ o Database Design and Publishing
Tel: 805/683-5784 o User-Interface Design
~~~~~~~~~~ My latest project: ~~~~~~~~~~
The interactive Web authoring tutorial for AOLpress. Download AOLpress
at http://www.aolpress.com/, install, run, and choose Help-->Tutorial.
TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-